My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 10-12-2004
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CCP 10-12-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:19:46 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 3:36:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION <br />September 20, 2004 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Council Member Grant noted that the City has nineteen miles of roads that need to be . <br />reconstructed. In essence a 20-year plan correlates to one mile per year. In the past, the City <br />would complete reconstruction projects on even years and mill-overlay projects on odd years. <br />He questioned if the City should be this aggressive with the Pavement Management Program <br />(PMP). <br /> <br />Operations and Maintenance Director Tom Moore mentioned that the current CIP includes costs <br />associated with water, sewer, and storm water improvements. The proposed CIP is not just the <br />cost for bituminous materials. The 20 year plan only included bituminous costs. <br /> <br />Council Member Grant noted that much of the Red Fox-Grey Fox project will be milled and <br />over-layed. It would be halfthe cost of completing a road reconstruction project. <br /> <br />Council Member Larson raised concerns about having the proposed Floral and Glenhill <br />neighborhood reconstruction projects in the same year. He would like to see the Floral project <br />pushed back one year. <br /> <br />Council Member Rem noted that the reason why the City adopted an every-other-year <br />philosophy pertaining to road reconstruction projects was to allow the funding sources to grow <br />and the City would have money on hand for these types of projects. <br /> <br />City Engineer Greg Brown mentioned that repairs to the water tower, sewer mains, water mains, . <br />and lift stations are draining down the enterprise funds. All storm sewer repairs are being <br />included in Pavement Management Program (PMP) projects. <br /> <br />Mayor Applikowski raised the concern that an aggressive PMP program may make the City <br />more financially susceptible to problems down the road and that we may not have enough money <br />on hand in case of an emergency. <br /> <br />City Administrator Wolfe noted that some CIP projects were funded through non-revenue <br />generating fund sources. A second concern is whether or not the City can take a year off and <br />still reach our financial and maintenance goals and objectives. <br /> <br />At the present time funding reserves are not used for PMP projects. The only new funding <br />mechanism is the proposed utility rate increase. The City currently has a state aid balance of <br />$300,000. <br /> <br />Council Member Grant was wondering why staff is planning to reconstruct three lift stations next <br />year. <br /> <br />Mr. Moore noted that the lift stations that are scheduled for reconstruction were built in the <br />1950s. Lift stations typically have a life span of 30 years. At this time, these lift stations are <br />becoming very expensive to maintain and it is becoming very difficult to locate replacement <br />parts. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.