Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.; <br /> <br />ARDEN HlLLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION <br />October 18, 2004 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant wondered why the City has so many reconstruction projects scheduled? <br /> <br />Greg Brown mentioned that the City evaluatcs and ratcs thc bituminous surface, drainage, curb <br />and gutter, storm water drainage. and the status of the utilities before determining a project's <br />priority status. Typically asphalt that is rated with a 60-80% PCI is scheduled for mill and <br />overlay. Ifthc bituminous surface receives a rating under 60%, the bituminous surfacc may need <br />to be reconstructed. <br /> <br />Councilmembcr Holden asked ifPCI is the largest factor in determining road rcpairs. <br /> <br />Engineer Brown agreed that thc PCI rating is the largest factor in determining future road repairs. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson wondered what changed in the utility rate study? <br /> <br />Finance Director Siddiqui stated that the numbers did change a little bit The City's cash balance <br />dropped when thc projected utility rates were set at $ I 8.00 per household on average as <br />requested by the Council <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson was wondcring why the cash balance dropped? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Siddiqui mentioncd that study is a "cash flow" model. A reduction in revenue resulted in a <br />drop in the cash balance. Mr. Siddiqui also noted that the revenue portion of the utility rate study <br />dropped as did the numbers on the proposed CIP projects. The average rate increase is $] 8.00 <br />per quarter for rcsidents that use 15,000 gallons of water during the winter months, If a resident <br />uses more than 15,000 gallons of water their utility bill will show an increase based upon thcir <br />consumption. It was also pointed out that the proposed rate structure has a usage componcnt for <br />sewer rates beyond the 15,000 gallons per quartcr average. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked which projects were pushed back or removed? <br /> <br />Engineer Brown reported that the sanitary sewer fund was reduced and the number oflift stations <br />being remodeled were minimized from 3 to 2 on a yearly basis. <br /> <br />Finance Director Siddiqui noted that the proposed expenditures were based on today's material <br />cost The cost for supplies and materials may rise in the future. <br /> <br />Engineer Brown mentioned that water repairs are fairly reasonable in cost The City has already <br />repaired approximately 30,000 feet of clay pipe and] 5,000 feet of water line that has bccn sealed <br />or lined. The City has approximately $3.5 million in lining and sealing projects ovcr thc next ]3 <br />years. The worst water pipe areas in the City have already been repaired. <br /> <br />Councilmcmber Larson believes that the City may have to construct a ncw watcr tower if the <br />City procecds with the TCAAP project. <br /> <br />. Engineer Brown stated that a water tower may be needed III the future, but hopefully future <br />developers will pay for this expense. <br />