Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />AUGUST 29, 2005 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />completely against the roundabouts. Shc stated she was under the impression that buying into the <br />neighborhood that she was automatically a member ofthc Beach Club. <br /> <br />Tom Ostby, 3517 Siems Court, stated he would be materially aflected by the changes to the <br />retaining wall. He indicated hc would like to see the street continue to go through and they have <br />been maintaining it, not the City. He did not believc an easement agreement would be necessary. <br />He stated he wanted more information with respcet to the vegetation on the hill and the retaining <br />wall look. He stated he was willing to compromise and would like to meet with the City <br />Engineer. He stated he wanted to kcep the right-of-way open becausc they owned two lots and <br />believed his property value would be affected if the right-of-way wcre closed. <br /> <br />Steve Erickson, 3442 Siems Court, stated he was in favor of a 4" surmountable curb. He agrced <br />a surmountablc curb would lead to a less structured appearance. He stated he had done an <br />informal poll and several of the surrounding cities and neighborhood residential areas had <br />surmountable curb. He indicated was not in support of the roundabouts and did not believe there <br />was enough traffic to warrant them, but requcsted the City take an aggressive stancc on <br />roundabouts and adding them on Old Snclling. With respcct to drainage, he did want to see more <br />information as to what was being proposed, including the design. He stated he believed the <br />membership of the Beach Club was 50-55 residents, which was 10-12 under the assessed number <br />of homes. Hc also noted there were somc Snelling A venue residents that were also members, <br />approximately 3-4, that would need to also be taken into consideration when the assessment was . <br />put together. He requested more information as to how the water main decision was going to be <br />made. Mr. Brown responded in the past they rcplaced the mechanical parts of the system and if <br />they found a main that was in poor condition, it was replaced, but in this case, they would first <br />start with the budget. <br /> <br />Mr. Erickson statcd he was not in favor of sidcwalks and there was not enough traffic to justify <br />them. He asked about the construction on lift station 4 and the fill being placed in there, as well <br />as the trees being removed. Mr. Brown replied with respect to fill, there should not be any <br />sizable change when it was done, but temporarily there were spoil piles which would be graded <br />down whcn the old lift station was removed. With respect to the trees, whcre the force main came <br />out, some trees needed to be removcd, and would not be replanted ovcr the main. He stated they <br />would attempt to provide screening though. <br /> <br />Mr. Eriekson noted he had volunteered to be the Beach Club's liaison. <br /> <br />Phil Henry, 3520 Ridgewood Court, Beach Club Secretary, stated they had a Beach Club <br />meeting and there was a general enthusiasm for the storm water runoff project and using the <br />Beach Club marsh as some part of that, but questions wcre raised as to the compensation to the <br />Beach Club. He stated they did not want roundabouts and they wanted to preserve as many trees <br />as possible. Hc stated in general he belicvcd everyone was looking favorably toward this. <br /> <br />Steve Nelson, 3475 Siems Court, pointed out there was a 2-inch overlay placed on Siems Court a <br />few years ago which raised the elevation up. He asked them to take that into consideration when <br /> <br />. <br />