Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. , <br /> <br />URS <br /> <br />Agenda Item 2A <br /> <br />Thresher Square <br />700 Third Street South <br />Minneapolis, MN 55415 <br />Phone: (612) 370-0700 <br />Fax: (612) 370-1378 <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />Michelle Wolfe/Arden Hills <br />City Administrator <br /> <br />File: 31809363 <br /> <br />From: Gregory S. Brown <br />Arden Hills City Engineer <br /> <br />Date: January 19,2005 <br /> <br />Subject: CSAH 96 Landscaping Improvements <br /> <br />Background <br />The Council directed staff to develop concepts and cost estimates for potential landscaping <br />improvements along CSAH 96 in addition to the proposed County Scope. Kathy Ryan has <br />prepared two alternatives for Council consideration and comments. The following is a brief <br />description of the alternatives, including plant materials, cost and maintenance issues. <br />Renderings of the alternatives are attached to the memo. Kathy will be present at the meeting <br />Monday to discuss the concepts and provide renderings of the entire corridor. <br /> <br />Landscaping Concept Discussion <br />URS has prepared two alternative landscape plans and cost estimates for Highway 96. The plan <br />for boulevard trees is the sarne for both alternatives. Green Ash, White Ash, Red Oak and <br />Swamp White Oak trees are proposed in alternating groupings of three and four. These <br />groupings will alternate from north to south and provide a continuous rhythm along the highway <br />without imposing a rigid order that would accentuate missing trees. The number of trees is <br />similar in both alternatives, and the bulk of the cost would be taken care of by Rarnsey County. <br /> <br />, <br />The color graphics included portray two alternative median planting schemes. Each scheme <br />shows planting group A and planting group B. These two groups represent the different median <br />configurations at the intersections. The numbers of each group for each alternative are listed on <br />the graphics. <br /> <br />Alternative I consists of plantings that are linear in character and spread evenly along the <br />corridor. This cxplains the higher number of plant groupings in alternative 1. The preliminary <br />cost estimate for Alternative I includes approximately $115,000 in County costs and $190,000 in <br />City costs for a total project cost of $305,000. Thc cost of Alternative] could be reduced by <br />eliminating three or four of the planting bcds along the corridor keeping only the planting areas <br />near the intersections. <br />