My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-31-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
01-31-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:45 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:22:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />., <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Clark informed the council that they may need to meet almost weekly in the next few <br />months to work through key issues. Councilmember Holden asked about the framework <br />plan. She asked what "framework" means and what does approval of a framework plan <br />mean? Mr. Clark responded that it is by no means a final plan but shows some general <br />outlines for the proposed development. Conncilmember Holden indicated that there may <br />not be clear understandings in the public regarding exactly what a framework plan <br />represents. <br /> <br />Ms. Wolfe asked that the Mayor and City Council members communicate to her and/or <br />Mr. Clark and concerns or questions that they have as the process moves along, It will <br />move quickly and it is complex so it is vital for staffto be aware of Council's issues, <br />questions and concerns. Councilmember Holden indicated that it would be helpful to <br />received updates in a more timely fashion. For example, she would appreciate an e-mail <br />update quickly after major meetings such as those with the GSA. Staff responded that <br />they would do so. Ms. Wolfe indicated that perhaps a running update, with new <br />information added in bold, would be helpful so that there would always be an ability to <br />look back at previous information and updates, <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked about the survey ofthe property, She asked if we can sign <br />an agreement without knowing exact boundaries. Mr. Clark indicated that CRR had <br />already paid for and conducted another survey, which he believes has resolved most of <br />the questions. He also noted that one of the items on the task list is to complete a final <br />survey prior to the offer to purchase. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski asked about the status of the athletic complex. Ms. Wolfe responded <br />that there hasn't been much activity regarding that issue. She further stated that to her <br />understanding, the school district was working to update a survey to assess the needs of <br />the area communities for such a complex. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski also asked about the status of the wild life corridor. She expressed <br />concern about how that affects the project as a whole. Ms. Wolfe noted that nothing has <br />really happened with that discussion lately, either. However, there has been some push in <br />the past for a Memorandum of Understanding between the County, GSA and City. <br />Caution was recommended at this time until we are further along knowing how the whole <br />project fits together, including an understanding of the financing. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark informed the Council that the Anny is hoping to transfer as much ofthe <br />property as possible under a FOST process rather than all of it as a FOSET. However, <br />the two processes would be done simultaneously so that the property as a whole is <br />transferred all at one time. <br /> <br />There was discussion as to the value of the primer tracer area. There was consensus that <br />there is value to keeping it as part of the overall project at this time, and to try and work <br />out the issues. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.