Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />~~LLS <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />On October 11, 2004, the Arden Hills City Council directed the newly formed Economic Development <br />Commission (EDC) to study the following charge, "Does the Twin Cities Anny Ammunition Plant <br />(TCAAP)' project need economic development assistance and what types of issues does this present to <br />the City as a whole." The EDC's initial review centered on the issues of public financing (non-private <br />funds necessary to assist in financing portions of the redevelopment) and how future TCAAP <br />redevelopment business transactions could be constructed to ensure that existing residents will not have <br />additional tax burdens. However, after a number of meetings it became clear that the TCAAP project <br />redevelopment, which has been looked at with caution and concern on how it may affect the City, can <br />also act as positive catalyst in tenus of capitalizing community redevelopment funds, recreational funds, <br />and a number of other benefits. The second issue that was raised was the cost of local government <br />services in the TCAAP area. All of the aforementioned issues have been addressed within the policy <br />statement. <br /> <br />Before summarizing the committee's recommendations regarding public financing participation in the <br />TCAAP project, the issue of "why should the City of Arden Hills redevelop the TCAAP property" needs <br />to be addressed. Although no official City document states a "development value" for the community, it <br />is commonly understood that many Arden Hills residents view the City as village and maintaining a rural <br />character is important. Others in the community view that the City is in transition between a village and <br />hecoming a city. The difference hetween a village and a city is difficult to quantify and articulate but it <br />appears that some of the issues rest with the questions of appropriate levels of community service, the <br />desire to pay for those services, the purpose, and function of local government and how future <br />development/redevelopment within the community should be valued and designed. <br /> <br />The EDC views that the TCAAP redevelopment, as illustrated III the city's Framework Vision, IS <br />beneficial to the City as a whole based on the following: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Based on Congressional action, t:fle U.S. .'\rm)' :flas BeeR ordered te aiSJ'lose t:fle TC.,,"A~D property <br /> <br /> <br />thr81igh an early transf"r proeess property. The EDC 'liews !flat this proeess, whioh is ROW in <br /> <br /> <br />progress, mandates that the sale ofthe property from tfle U.S. ,\rmy to the private market oeeurs <br /> <br />1 In this summary, TCAAP refers to the apprCtximate 585 acres as illustrnted in the "TCAAP Framework Vision" dated January 13,2005. <br /> <br />Page 1 of5 <br />llEarthlPlanning'Misc FileslEDClexecutive summary - Copy with Council and EDC Strikeouts and Bold Text.doc <br />