My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-21-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
03-21-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:45 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:23:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />~HILLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />March 16,2005 <br /> <br />Agenda Item 2.C <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor and Council <br />Michelle Wolfe, City Administrator <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Thomas J. Moore; Director of Operations & Mai~)? <br />Scott Clark; Community Development Director~ <br /> <br />Status Update on Gateway Signage for 2005 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />On Friday, February 11, 2005, the Gateway Signage Task Force met to discuss and review <br />possible options for gateway signage in the City of Arden Hills. The task force reviewed <br />possible locations, size/style of signage, sign composition, lighting/landscape and the budget. <br /> <br />The task force determined that the CIP budget of $30,000.00 would allow for the installation of <br />one sign. The chosen location was the intersection of County Road D & Cleveland Avenue. <br /> <br />Attached you will find a photo showing how the sign would look at the County Road D & <br />Cleveland Avenue intersection. No lighting will be used to display/highlight the sign and <br />landscape options are limited. Also attached are sign style and composition samples. The task <br />force thought that there should be some consistency with existing park signs, which have. <br />received a favorable response from the community, thus option #4 was selected. <br /> <br />The PTRC and the Planning Commission will review this information in the near future. The <br />task force's goal is to bring back a recommendation for consideration by the City Council in <br />May, 2005. <br /> <br />\\Eafth\PR&PW\Operations & Maintenance\Misc\Gateway Signage (WorkScssion Memo).doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.