Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />~HILLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />March 16, 2005 <br /> <br />Agenda Item 2.D and 2.E <br /> <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br />Michelle Wolfe, City Administrator <br /> <br />FROM: Scott Clark, Community Development Director ~ <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Phase IV PlanninglTCAAP/ Framework Vision <br /> <br />Based on a question from a Councilmember, part of the purpose of this memorandum is to <br />explain how Phase IV planning relates to the overall TCAAP process. The question and concern <br />is, what happens in Phase IV if the costs associated with the project raise the need for public <br />financing to an unacceptable or economically infeasible level? The second purpose of this <br />memorandum is detail out how the TCAAP process win unfold, attached is a flow chart that <br />illustrates the same_ <br /> <br />As the attached flow chart illustrates, the overan concept is to go through a series of Council . <br />approved actions that continuously redefines the TCAAP process and the project into more <br />specific terms_ The TCAAP Framework Vision is the first key step and is intended to be the <br />foundation for aU other actions. The purpose ofthe Vision was outlined in the resolution <br />presented at the February 28, 2005 Council Meeting and the same is attached_ The TCAAP <br />Vision allows the City (and the City's development partner, CRR, me.) to perform the fonowing: <br /> <br />. Develop an extensive analysis regarding the construction costs of implementing the <br />TCAAP Framework Vision. From this analysis, an estimate of needed public financing <br />will be arrived at and then analyzed by the City's third party financial consultant. If <br />public financing is needed, the estimation win give us the ability to judge how "price <br />sensitive" the Plan is. As an example, if the amount of public financing needed is <br />$60,000,000 and the projection for tax increment is $70,000, the City will need to look <br />at the reasons, inherent within the Plan, that is driving the cost and recognize that little <br />room is available for density reduction discussions since it's the value of real estate that <br />determines the amount of tax increment. On the other hand, if the projected need for tax <br />increment is $30,000,000, there would be a great deal of flexibility since projected tax <br />increment is double this amount. The key issue is that no realistic estimate can be <br />obtained until there is a consensus to the City's goal; which is the TCAAP Framework <br />Vision. <br /> <br />. It is important to recognize that the TCAAP Framework Plan is not the developer's <br />plan, but is the community's plan that has been developed over a whole series of <br />different processes_ m many redevelopment scenarios, the developer brings a concept . <br />to the City and asks for public financing to assist in the costs of redevelopment. m this <br />