Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />t. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />EXECUTIVES~RY <br /> <br />DPRA conducted this Phase II Investigation at the former Arden Hills Public Works Facility <br />(Site) located at 1440 West Highway 96 in Arden Hills, Minnesota, between January 19, and <br />February 11,2005. As part of the investigation, DPRA performed soil screening and sampling <br />during the excavation of 21 test pits and advancement of II soil probes in accordance with <br />DPRA's recommendations to the City of Arden Hills in its Phase I Environmental Assessment <br />Report, dated December 16, 2004. Soil samples were collected from thesubsurface, and <br />submitted to a laboratory for chemical analysis; the range of chemical analyses included: <br />volatile organic compounds (VOCs), gasoline range organics (GRO), diesel range organics <br />(ORO), polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), RCRA metals, and polychlorinated <br />biphenyls (PCBs). Specific analyses of each sample were based upon the potential <br />contamination source in the area of the soil probes. <br /> <br />Soil Conclusions <br /> <br />The soil lithology identified with the sampling activities at the Site is consistent with the results <br />from the test pits and the regional geologic information, which consist of up to 8 feet of mixed <br />fill underlain by nati ve sandy clay till to a depth of at least 32 feet bgs. The fill appears to be a <br />remnant of road construction projects and is composed of asphalt, concrete. gravel, crushed rock <br />sand, and other materials such as wood mulch, chips, and tree trimmings, and street sweepings. <br />In addition. a mixture a concrete, scrap metal, glass, electrical cords, metal cans, and wood was <br />uncovered in a relatively isolated area southeast of the maintenance building. <br /> <br />P AH constituents, metals, acetone and DRO were detected in the soil and fill materials <br />throughout the Site. DPRA reported the presence of soil contamination to the State Duty Officer <br />on February 18, 2005 in accordance with Minnesota Statute 115.061. The approximate extent of <br />the soil contamination is indicated by the yellow dashed boundary line on Figure 2. <br /> <br />To assess the extent and magnitude of the soil contamination, DPRA used the Minnesota <br />Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) established soil reference values (SRVs) and the soil leaching <br />values (SL Vs), which are presented in the MPCA Risk-Based Site Evaluation Guidance. dated <br />November 2, 1999. No individual constituent concentration or benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) equivalent <br />concentration exceeded the SRVs or SLVs in any of the samples collected. DRO concentrations <br />ranged from <3.6 mg/kg to 92 mg/kg. There are no established SRV or SL V for DRO <br />concentrations. GRO was not detected in any soil probe borings at concentrations greater than <br />method detection limits. Although, the complete horizontal and vertical extent of the <br />contaminated soil is undefined; however, the source of contamination appears to have been <br />historical filling and application of used oil on the ground surface for dust suppression. <br /> <br />Groundwater Conclusions <br /> <br />No groundwater was encountered in any of the soil probe locations. According to other <br />published reports, groundwater in the area of the Site is approximately 90 feet below the ground <br />surface and flows to the southwest. The residual contamination in the on-site soil does not <br />appear to pose a risk of impacting the groundwater at the Site. <br /> <br />~ Phase II Investigation Report <br />.~H]US Former Public Works Facility <br /> <br />~~DPRA <br />