My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
04-11-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:45 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:23:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
245
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />~HILLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />Agenda Item 6.D <br /> <br />April 11, 2005 <br /> <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner N <br />"7!'- <br /> <br />SUBJECT: PC #05-07, The City of Arden Hills <br />Setback Exceptions for Front Porches <br /> <br />Requested Action <br /> <br />· Consider Ordinance #357 which would amend section 6.C.2.a of the Zoning Ordinance <br />and insert new section 6.C.2.d into the Zoning Ordinance, allowing for front porches of <br />up to ten feet and with a minimum setback of30 feet from the front or side-yard comer <br />property lines, which meet design standards to be allowed subject to staff review and <br />approval. <br />· Consider Resolution #05-29 which would add the front porch language and Front Porch <br />Design Guidelines to Appendix A of Zoning Ordinance #291. <br /> <br />Planninl! Commission Recommendation <br /> <br />Recommendation and Conditions of Approval <br />At their March 2, 2005 meeting the Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case #05-07 and <br />unanimously recommended approval (5-0) of the Zoning Ordinance Amendments as proposed. <br /> <br />Update <br /> <br />I have fielded questions from several residents interested in the front porches as permitted <br />encroachment language. Two residents have raised the question of exterior wall material; one <br />was advocating for only open-air porches, the other for open-air or full screen porches and not 3- <br />season porches. As currently proposed, the language from the proposed design guidelines reads <br />that: <br /> <br />"The exterior walls are considered to be those exterior surfaces from the floor line to the <br />ceiling of the porch. This surface is to be at least 65 percent open and 35 percent solid <br />The open surfaces are to be open air or occupied by operable windows. screens, and/or <br />full lite doors. The solid surfaces are to be exterior materials that are consistent or <br />complemental)' in color, texture, and quality to those of the front of the existing home. " <br /> <br />\\EarthIPlanning\Planning Cases\2005\05-07 Zoning Ordi:mce Amendments for Front Porch Encroachments (PENDING)\04~t ]-05 CC Report <br />Front Porch Exceptions,doc <br /> <br />Page 1 of2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.