My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
04-11-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:45 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:23:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
245
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />MARCH 28, 2005 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated this was an exciting time as they were able to get this piece of <br />property and come up with a community based plan. He stated if they were not to have this <br />vision, the Army would sell it off in pieces at different times to different buyers. He indicated <br />they needed to realize that and this plan was still a work in process and it would go through <br />changes as they went through the process. He noted this plan had parks as well as a number of <br />other open areas, which was part of the Vento plan. He indicated it had open areas between <br />development buildings, which were something the residents valued. He thanked everyone that <br />was taking part both in terms of this plan and those who were continuing to take part ofthis plan, <br />including the staff. He stated he would support the vision. <br /> <br />Former Mayor Dennis Probst urged the Council to support this unanimously as this was a <br />fulfillment of a 55-year dream. He stated the step they were taking tonight was a major one and <br />in the long term it will be a good decision for the City. He stated the land that was left here was <br />an accident of history and now there was an opportunity to make this a fabulous part ofthe City. <br />He stated this property was going to be developed and he could think of nothing worse than the <br />City not taking over and fulfilling the vision. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski thanked former Mayor Probst for his comments and noted if it was not for <br />him, this vision would not be where it was. She also thanked the stafffor all their hard work. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL REPORTS <br /> <br />Council member Holden - Stated the newsletter articles are due. She asked if the Newsletter <br />Committee wanted to comment on the framework vision could they make comment. Mayor <br />Aplikowski stated this was something they needed to decide on as committees were established. <br />She noted the PTRC had operated in a unique way and had taken upon themselves many projects <br />and issues and because of the very nature of the committee it had a fund and it had property <br />which they dealt with in a different way than the other committees. She indicated if the <br />Newsletter Committee wanted to issue a letter of support or ideas, they could do that and it <br />would be welcomed. <br /> <br />Council member Larson stated he believed this was one of the most important decisions the <br />City embarked upon and it would be great if all of the committees came forward with <br />recommendations and he believed it was appropriate for them to do that. He noted he had made <br />a presentation at the PTRC regarding TCAAP and the PTRC wanted to make comment on this. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant - Stated he would not be in attendance at the Planning Commission <br />meeting this month due to being out of town. He stated now that they have approved the vision, <br />one of the items Council should consider is instead of referring to this area as the TCAAP, Army . <br />Ammunition Plan, superfund site, etc, he suggested they come up with a name for this area that <br />fit the vision. Councilmember Larson stated that was a good idea and they should look at <br />doing this at some point in the future. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.