Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />~HILLS <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />On October 11,2004, the Arden Hills City Council direeted the newly formed Economic Development <br />Commission (EDC) to study the following charge, "Does the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant <br />(TCAAP)1 project need economic developmcnt assistance and what types of issues does this present to <br />the City as a whole." The EDC's initial review centered on the issues of public financing (non-private <br />funds necessary to assist in financing portions of the redevelopment) and how future TCAAP <br />redevelopment business transactions eould be constructed to ensure that existing residents will not have <br />additional tax burdens. However, after a number of meetings it became clear that the TCAAP project <br />redevelopment, which has been looked at with caution and concern on how it may affect the City, can <br />also act as positive catalyst in terms of capitalizing community redevelopment funds, reereational funds, <br />and a number of other benefits. The second issue that was raised was the cost of local government <br />services in the TCAAP area. All of the aforementioned issues have been addressed within the policy <br />statement. <br /> <br />Before summarizing the committee's recommendations regarding public financing participation in the <br /> <br /> <br />TCAAP project, the issue of "why should the City of Arden Hills redevelop the TCAAP property" needs <br /> <br /> <br />to be addressed. Although no official City document states a "development value" for the community, it <br /> <br /> <br />is eommonly understood that many Arden Hills residents view the City as village and maintaining a rural <br /> <br /> <br />character is important. Others in the community view that the City is in transition between a village and <br /> <br /> <br />becoming a city. The difference between a village and a city is difficult to quantifY and articulate but it <br /> <br /> <br />appears that some of the issues rest with the questions of appropriate levels of community service, the <br /> <br /> <br />desire to pay for those services, the purpose, and function of local government and how future <br /> <br /> <br />development/redevelopment within the community should be valued and designed. <br /> <br />The EDC views that the TCAAP redevelopment, as illustrated in the city's Framework Vision, is <br />beneficial to the City as a whole based on the following: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />In 2002 the U.S. Army declared 774 acres of property as exeess ( this includes the primary 455 <br /> <br /> <br />acre development parcel, the Wildlife Corridor, the north primer tracer area and the Riee Creek <br /> <br /> <br />Corridor ). This deelaration started a process of disposal which eventually resulted in the City <br /> <br />I In this summary, TCAAP refers 10 the approximate 585 acres as illustrated in the "TCAAP Framework Vision" dated March 9, 2005. <br /> <br />\\Earth\Planning\Misc Files\EDC\executive summary. doc <br /> <br />Page I of5 <br />