My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
04-11-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:45 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:23:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
245
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION MINUTES <br />MARCH 14,2005 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Ms. Wolfe stated they would need to look at another fund and evaluate its use. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated what they needed to decide on was if they wanted street lights or not. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson noted right now there were two people who were for it and two who <br />were not for it and so they did not have the support to move forward with this, but he was not <br />opposed to looking at the street light policy. <br /> <br />Ms. Wolfe asked if there was consensus to have staff look at the existing policy and compile <br />information, such as financing, and come back to the Council for a future meeting. <br />Councilmember Larson replied this was a good suggestion. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated whether they went forward or not, the Council did not like the light <br />fixture they were proposing and it was a maybe or maybe not with adding lights on Lexington <br />Avenue. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski asked if the Council was or was not interested in even looking at street <br />lights. Councilmcmber Larson stated he did not know how to answer this question because he <br />did not have any costs or options. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated if they wanted to do this, then staff could get the information, but if <br />the Council did not want lights, then she did not want to waste staffs time researching this. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he was comfortable with leaving the policy as it was. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if they even knew what the policy said. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski requested stafflocate the policy to see what it said. <br /> <br />SUB-GROUND INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEM FOR THE CITY <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated at the February 28, 2005 Council Meeting, the Council requested that staff <br />provide detailed information regarding the City's underground infrastructure and the processes <br />used to determine which facilities are included in the ClF. They have completed the annual <br />update of City watermain, sanitary sewer and storm sewer system maps including annotations of <br />pipe materials and initial construction year (for sanitary and watermain) as requested by Council. <br />He gave a general overview of the current system condition, potential problem areas and <br />rehabilitation techniques and strategies for sanitary sewer and watermain. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked what areas had been televised. Mr. Brown replied all areas had <br />been televised except the area around Hamline and 694. He noted that Arden Manor was not the <br />City's responsibility, but they had televised the trunk. He noted televising would need to be an <br />ongomg process. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.