Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MARCH 2, 2005 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />the land should include an "if visible" clause to regulate the signage. The signs that are <br />not visible would not be subject to the regulation; those that are would have to comply <br />with the new size standards and would be required to file sign permit applications as <br />described in the ordinance. In addition, members of the Planning Commission <br />recommended that the "if visible" clause should establish who was determining if the <br />signage was visible. Staff has included language that would ultimately give that authority <br />to the City Councilor City Administrator. <br /> <br />He recommended approval of the seven Sign Ordinance Amendments as proposed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson recommended they designate a cenain staff member or designee to <br />look into the signage. He noted as it was worded that City Councilor City Administrator <br />shall determine if the signage is visible was poor wording for an Ordinance. <br /> <br />Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 8:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Chair Sand invited anyone for or against the variance to come forward and make <br />comment. <br /> <br />Bruce Kunkel, 3452 Glen Arden Road and Administrator at Bethel College, thanked staff <br />and the Commission for their work on this. He believed this would work well for both <br />Bethel College and the residents. <br /> <br />Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 8:31 p.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson moved, seconded by Commissioner Bezdicek to approve Planning <br />Case No. 05-08: City of Arden Hills, ]245 W. Highway 96; Sign Ordinance <br />Amendments for Athletic Field Signage at Bethel University, Northwestern College, and <br />Mounds View High School. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />D. PLANNING CASE 05-07: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS. 1245 W, HIGHWAY 96. <br />ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS FOR IO-FOOT FRONT PORCH <br />EXCEPTION TO FRONT SETBACK IN R-I AND R-2 ZONING DISTRICTS <br /> <br />Mr. Hellegers requested the Commission consider staffs recommendation to amend <br />Section 6.C.2.a. of the Zoning Ordinance and insen new section 6.C.2.d into the Zoning <br />Ordinance. <br /> <br />He recommended approval of Zoning Amendments #1 and #2 to allow for steps, decks, <br />and ramps as Permitted Encroachments up to 6 feet in all Zoning Districts and to allow <br />Front Porches as Permitted Encroachments of up to 10 feet, provided that the front porch <br />is no closer than 30 feet from any front or side lot line, for Single-Family Dwellings. <br /> <br />Chair Sand asked what for the definition of residential street side yard. Mr. Hellegers <br />replied that would be a corner property. <br /> <br />Chair Sand asked if they wanted to allow some flexibility in the footing and foundation <br />materials so it was complimentary to the home. He expressed concern that it might be <br />