My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-18-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
04-18-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:45 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:24:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JANUARY 5, 2005 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Ordinance to include setback exceptions for front porches and should the eXlstmg . <br />language be maintained and porches allowed only if they meet the current regulations. <br /> <br />Chair Sand asked if they were going to go ten feet into the setback from the most <br />extended portion of the house, they could go ten feet beyond the garage point. Mr. Clark <br />stated this would be measured from the principal structure and not the garage. <br /> <br />Chair Sand asked if it made sense to have a shorter encroachment for an open deck than <br />an enclosed porch. Commissioner Larson noted steps, decks and ramps were considered <br />a part of the principal structure. <br /> <br />Chair Sand stated it did not make sense to have a 6 foot setback for an open deck and a <br />10 foot setback for an enclosed porch. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson stated a deck was not integrated into the primary structure, where <br />an enclosed porch needed to be compatible with the existing roofline. <br /> <br />Commissioner Holmes believed New Brighton also had this type of a program and <br />suggested staff check with that City as to what their ordinance said. <br /> <br />E, PLANNING COMMISSION 2005 TENT A TIVE MEETING DATES <br /> <br />Mr. Clark presented the tentative meeting dates for the 2005 Planning Commission . <br />meetings. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman asked if they wanted to hold a Planning Commission meeting <br />on July 6 or should they hold it the following week to avoid vacation conflicts. ML Clark <br />asked if they also wanted to move the September meeting to the following week because <br />ofthe Labor Day holiday and that start of school. <br /> <br />Chair Sand also noted they might need to change the June meeting due to Memorial Day_ <br /> <br />F. PLANNING COMMISSION 2005 PC WORK PLAN <br /> <br />ML Clark noted the Planning Commissioner 2005 Work Plan would be presented at the <br />February meeting. <br /> <br />REPORTS <br /> <br />A. Planning Commissioners <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />B. Staff <br /> <br />ML Clark updated the Commission on recent TCAAP developments and the old City . <br />Hall site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.