My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-25-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
04-25-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:45 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:24:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - APRIL 6, 2005 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Chair Sand asked if the neighbors concern had been addressed, Mr. Hellegers replied the <br />neighbors wanted to see the proposal and make sure the trees were preserved, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Chair Sand asked if the trees on the Certificate of Survey were ~ew plantings or were <br />they existing vegetation. Mr, Hellegers showed the current aerial photograph and where <br />the landscaping presently was located, He noted most of the trees on th" Certificate were <br />existing trees, <br /> <br />Chair Sand asked if there had been any contact to the neighbor to the west regarding the <br />drainage issues. Mr, Hellegers replied they had not been spoken to yet, but they were <br />given notice of his proposal. <br /> <br />Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 7:47 p,m. <br /> <br />Chair Sand invited applicant to come forward and make comment. <br /> <br />Roland KarjaJahti, 1137 Edgewater Avenue, stated presently they had a couple of <br />retaining walls on the property, which would be redone and the reconfiguration of the <br />retaining walls had not been decided on yet until he knew if the variance was approved or <br />not, but he would work with City staff on these retaining walls. He noted with the new <br />retaining walls, this would address any drainage issues, He stated he had spoken to the <br />property owner to the west and he has not had any unusual flooding or drainage probJems <br />on this property. He indicated he had also spoken with the property owner to the north . <br />about the trees and they definitely wanted to keep the trees to the north. He stated due to <br />the pavement management project in the area, much of the landscaping in the front had <br />been removed, but he wanted to put in more landscaping in the front. He asked if the <br />City Zoning Ordinances required replatting in this type of a situation. He noted in <br />Shoreview they would not require a replatting in this type of a situation, He indicated a <br />full final plat procedure was very expensive and because of the proximity to Lake <br />Josephine, the surveyor needed to follow certain State guidelines. He asked ifreplatting <br />was absolutely necessary. He noted this was two platted properties, but one tax parcel. <br /> <br />Chair Sand stated they would have to defer to staff as to whether or not this needed to be <br />replatted. Mr. Hellegers replied during recent meeting with staff and the City Attorney <br />this exact type of an issue was brought up and it was agreed upon that this process of <br />platting was the correct procedure to follow, <br /> <br />Chair Sand stated staff wouJd not change recommendation number 4, Mr, Hellegers <br />replied he believed this was the correct recommendation. <br /> <br />Chai~ Sand stated he liked this plan and it was a beautiful house and he believed this <br />would be an improvement to tl1e neighborhood. <br /> <br />Chair Sand invited anyone for or against the Varlance to come forward and make <br />comment. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Dave Monson, 1175 Edgewater, stated these plans looked very nice and he was very <br />much in favor ofthis proposal. <br /> <br />There were no further comments madc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.