Laserfiche WebLink
<br />variance impair the health, safety, comfort and general welfare of the public, nor will it be <br />contrary to the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan, the official map or this or any other .- <br />ordinance of the City." .. <br /> <br />Variance Findings <br /> <br />Minnesota State Stature 462,357, subd, 6, requires that Cities consider the following five matters <br />when hearing requests for zoning ordinance variances, <br /> <br />L Are the circumstances for which the variance is requested unique to the property? <br /> <br />(YES) The properties have the unique feature of a shared driveway. While there are <br />other properties in the City that have shared driveways, the combination of the shared <br />driveway with several other features such as; no on-street parking at the location, the <br />speed of traffic on Lexington Avenue, the amount of vehicle trips per day on Lexington <br />Avenue, and the lack of shoulders to provide a safe access; create a very unique situation <br />for the applicants, <br /> <br />The properties are located with Karth Lake on the west, the park to the south and are cut <br />off from any access except for directly to Lexington Avenue. Since the properties will <br />have some access removed with the installation of the center median in the Lexington <br />Avenue Reconstruction, the additional driveways would provide better access for the <br />property owners. <br /> <br />Other properties in Arden Hills may be located along busy streets or have shared <br />driveways but staff has not encountered any other properties that have the same <br />combination of situations as outlined above. Properties along Highway 96 or Hamline <br />A venue may have access to a busy roadway but these properties either have roadway <br />shoulders where they can move to when trying to access their properties or have far less <br />traffic. Furthermore, staff has not seen an instance where one of these properties also <br />has a shared driveway. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The applicants have expressed concern that with the existing shared drive is difficult for <br />vehicles to enter and exit the properties at the same time. Since there is no shoulder on <br />Lexington and the reconstruction would eliminate any left-turn in access, a vehicle could <br />be stuck on Lexington Avenue waiting to access the property. The proposed additional <br />driveways would eliminate such situations and provide safer access for both properties. <br /> <br />2. Would granting the variance be in keeping with the spirit and intent ofthe City's <br />Zoning Ordinance? <br /> <br />The stated Purpose and Intent of the City's Zoning Ordinance includes thirteen purposes, <br />of those the following statements appear to be applicable: <br /> <br />\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-09 Radziej and Sabot Driveway Variances (PENDING)\02-02-05 PC Report Rodziej and Sabot <br />Driveway Variances.doc <br /> <br />Page 4 of7 <br /> <br />. <br />