Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MARCH 2, 2005 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson moved, seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman to recommend <br />denial of Planning Case No. 05-09: David Radziej and Roger Sabot, 4365 and 4367 . <br />Lexington Avenue; Driveway Variances, reasons for denial: I. The lack of detail plans <br />and the engineering necessary to show exactly what the dynamics of the access are going <br />to be. The owners have the opportunity to work this out between the City and the County <br />Engineers and come up with a better engineered plan than submitted, 2. The shared <br />access was a condition of approval for the original development of the site and other <br />conditions of approval, which was the turnaround was not met, so therefore, the <br />Commission did not know how the site functions if that condition was in place. 3. <br />multiple accesses to the property and the proximity to the Victoria and Amble <br />intersection would be more confusing and dangerous to traffic on Lexington Avenue and <br />to the occupants. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson believed the appJicants did have access problems and he could <br />look much more favorably on this if there were detailed engineering plans. <br />Commissioner Thompson agreed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman understood applicant's thoughts wanting two additional <br />driveways, but he did not see how the logistics would work. <br /> <br />Chair Sand stated he believed it was not the applicant's fault that the turnaround was not <br />put in, but this should have been taken care of at the time the building permit was issued. <br />He shared the other Commissioner's concerns and indicated he might be more amenable <br />going along with this proposal with detailed Engineering's plans, . <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />Roger Sabot stated they were not informed by the County that they needed a detailed <br />drawing; that they only needed a sketch, which is what they presented, <br /> <br />B. PLANNING CASE 05-06: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS. 1245 W. HIGHWAY 96; <br />CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES AMENDMENT FOR THERAPEUTIC <br />MASSAGE. <br /> <br />Mr. Hellegers stated staff was recommending repealing eXlstmg City Code Section <br />330.03 relating to massage, rap, and sauna parlors; adopting proposed Section 330,04 <br />relating to Massage Therapy Establishments and Massage Therapists; and Amending <br />Sections 5.E and 10.G of the Zoning Ordinance to reference Massage Therapists and <br />Massage Therapy Establishments. <br /> <br />Chair Sand requested a distinction be put in that the license went with the person and not <br />the house, so ifnew owners were to come in and they wanted licensing, they would need <br />to acquire it. <br /> <br />Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 8:13 p,m. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Chair Sand invited anyone for or against this Ordinance to comc forward. <br /> <br />Corrine Vahle, 1365 Arkwright St. #201, St. Paul, stated she was licenscd in New <br />Brighton and she had just surrendered her St. Paul license bccause the office where she <br />