Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,_ If..... . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - APRIL 6, 2005 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 7:56 p.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bezdicek stated he understood staffs comments with respect to the <br />replatting, but asked if there were any alternatives that would be acceptable to comply <br />with the guidelines. Mr. Hellegers replied there was a lot line that would run down the <br />middle of the house and this was the reason they needed to have this replatted. He noted <br />two alternatives they have in the Ordinance, did not apply to this type of a situation, He <br />indicated he believed replatting would be the correct procedure, <br /> <br />Mr. Clark stated they might be able to state in requirement 4 that the applicant should be <br />required to replat or convey by minor subdivision, which would give staff the opportunity <br />to reexam tl1is. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bezdicek, seconded by Commissioner Modcsette, to recommend approval <br />of Plalming Case No. 05-11: Roland KarjaJahti, 1137 Edgewater Avenue, Front/Side <br />Yard Comer Setback Variances subject to the recommendations made in staffs April 6, <br />2005 and modifying recommendation four to read: The applicant shall be required to <br />replat or convey by minor subdivision the property prior to the issuance of any building <br />permits, <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimousJy (4-0). <br /> <br />UNfiNISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />A. PLANNING CASE 05-09: DAVID RADZIEJ AND ROGER SABOT, 4365 <br />AND 4367 LEXINGTON AVENUE; DRIVEWAY VARIANCE. <br /> <br />Mr. Hellegers stated the applicants have requested variances to allow them to maintain <br />the existing shared driveway and add an additional driveway for each of the applicants' <br />property in Arden Hills, <br /> <br />He noted at the March, 2005 Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission <br />voted unanimousJy to deny the requested variance to maintain the existing shared <br />driveway and add one additional driveway for each of the properties, <br /> <br />He stated the applicants have reviewed the Planning Commission's direction and have <br />attempted to answer some of the Planning Commission's previous questions. <br /> <br />Staff recommended approval of the request for variance to allow one new driveway at <br />4365 and one new drivcway at 4367 while maintaining the existing shared driveway <br />subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />I. The applicants shall submit Zoning Permits with plans to the Building Official a <br />minimum of two (2) weeks before the planned start of construction. <br /> <br />2. The applicants will require approval from Ramsey County for the cub-cuts prior <br />to the installation of a new driveway. <br />