Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PCI Ratings for City Streets <br />May 26, 2005 <br />Page 2 of5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />agencies since the 1980's. GoodPointe does not provide professional engineering design/spec <br />services to their infrastmcture management clients. They feel this puts them in a position to <br />provide objective recommendations for multi-year maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation needs. <br />Their strategy for this proposed project, as outlined in their proposal, is to: <br /> <br />. Collect high quality pavement condition data according to the standards developed and <br />documented for this project; <br />. Highlight the technical issues facing the City of Arden Hills' infrastmcture network; <br />. Work with our staff to detem1ine aggressive, realistic goals for our network; <br />. Use a proven pavement management methodology to accomplish the goals; and, <br />. Establish the process so that Arden Hills can maintain its course with the PMS <br />information that is collected, <br /> <br />In the proposal, GoodPointe Technologies provided the City with tluee different options to <br />consider. Option 1 is a "Detailed PC1 Survey and Executive Summary Report". This basic <br />option provides the Ctiy with high quality pavement condition data and an executive summary <br />report to document network condition in 2005. Deliverables include the following: <br /> <br />. Pre-survey project kick-off meeting onsite with City staff; <br />. 100% surface area evaluation of all pavements; A <br />. Executive Summary Report to document the results of the condition survey (PCI _ <br />distribution of network, results by street block, etc.); <br />. Digital MS Excel spreadsheet of PC I results; and <br />. Digital MS Word document of executive summary report, <br /> <br />Option 1 will be provided to us for a cost of $4,500. They also will conduct curb and gutter <br />evaluation as part of Option 1. Staff recommends that this be included. <br /> <br />Option 2 from GoodPointe includes all items from Option 1, plus additional items as listed in the <br />first attachment to this memorandum. The cost for Option 2 would be $15,425. Option 3 <br />includes all items from Options 1 and 2, plus software and related software services (also <br />described in the attachment.) At this time, staff feels it would be premature and costly to <br />proceed with items outlined in Options 2 and 3. <br /> <br />Proposal: Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates <br />Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates (BonestTOo) is an engineering and architectural firm <br />located in Roseville. They provide engineering and architectural services to cities and counties <br />tluoughout the state. They have many years of experience doing PCI ratings for their clients. <br />They have done similar projects for Centerville, Spring Lake Park, and Oak Park Heights. They <br />use a system called the "Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating" method of street rating (i.e. <br />P ASER). They believe that this method provides the following benefits: <br /> <br />. User-friendly pavement condition rating; <br />. Accurate and consistent pavement condition scores; <br /> <br />e <br />