My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-31-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
05-31-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:45 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:24:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 4, 2005 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Commissioner Bezdicek asked what the ramification of their decision would have on Mr. <br />Peterson's negotiations with Ramsey County. Mr. Peterson responded he believed their <br />decision would have somewhat of an impact on what would happen, <br /> <br />Chair Sand asked to what extent the Commission had the authority to do this, He noted <br />they did not have the authority to deny this because the County had eminent domain <br />authority, Mr. Clark respondcd what was important was to make sure the Commission <br />separated the issues that Mr. Peterson's remedies were an issue between the County and <br />the property owner and what the City was doing was saying there would be an impact to <br />the property in the structure being non-conforming once the road was widened and <br />therefore, the Peterson's would need a variance for the non-conforming structure, which <br />would be helpful to both the Petersons and the City, <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson asked if granting the variance at this time was timely considering <br />the negotiation was not complete, He asked if this favored the County. Mr. Clark replied <br />all they were remedying was one issue, which was the non-conformity. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson asked if the variance was in place, did this aid the County because <br />there was not the non-conformity question. Mr. Clark replied from hif perspective, the <br />answer would be no because there was two issues - the non-conformity and the <br />negotiations the County was having with Mr. Peterson. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman asked what brought this to the City's attention. Mr. Clark <br />responded staff had looked awhile ago at what properties were going to be affected with <br />this road reconstruction and staff wanted to make sure that these types of requests were <br />all done at one time, He noted it was quite common to look at these issues in advance of <br />a road reconstruction, <br /> <br />Chair Sand asked if the County had already prepared a survey, Mr. Clark replied they <br />had. <br /> <br />Chair Sand indicated the only thing that had not been established was the amount of <br />compensation to the Petersons, Mr. Clark replied that was correct. <br /> <br />Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 7:49 p.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thompson moved, seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman to approve <br />Planning Case No. 05-14, The City of Arden Hills, 1105 Amble Drive, Variance, The <br />motion carried unanimously (6-0). <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />PLANNING CASE 05-05: CITY OF ADEN HILLS. 1245 WEST HIGHWAY 96: <br />REZONING THE OLD CITY HALL AND PUBLIC WORKS SITE 0440-1450 <br />HIGHWAY 96) FROM R-l: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO NB: <br />NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS <br /> <br />Mr, Hellegers stated applicant was requesting rezoning the western portion of the old <br />City Hall/Public Works site from R-l: Single Family Residential to NB: Neighborhood <br />Business. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.