My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-13-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
06-13-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:45 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:24:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />TCAAP Lar.d Negotiation <br />June 7, 2005 <br />Page 2 of2 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3) Have the City/CRR come to an agreement on density and/ or product type <br />(possibly the most important). <br /> <br />Densitv and/or Product Tvoe Agreement Issue <br /> <br />· The completion of a "density agreement" would provide CRR wi1h valuable information <br />that could assist in redefining their preliminary pro forma information and in turn, help <br />corroborate a future land purchase price, <br /> <br />· The completion of a "density agreement" would be the first part of planning Phase 4 as <br />shown on the time line attachment 1hat was previously given to Council. If1here was <br />agreement to proceed on this, a key question is how would 1he process work, e.g, <br />Planning Commission review first and then to Council,joinl sessions, etc. <br /> <br />· Iftht' Council wants 10 advance 1he "density agreement" discussion, which is done as <br />Phase 4, who will pay for 1hat service? At the present time the monetary budget, under <br />the existing City/CRR interim agreement is fully expended. <br /> <br />Communication <br /> <br />· What information and communications should the City have with 1heir Congressional <br />delegation? To date, our representatives have had a series of status letters given to them <br />in order to be kept current. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />· What are key messages to the media and the residents, as to the issues of continuing <br />negotiations? <br /> <br />Interim Agreement <br /> <br />· Since lhe City does not have an active Interim Agreement wi1h CRR, how do the <br />individual parties want to proceed with 1his issue? <br /> <br />· Is the City willing to take on more of a "monetary" leadership role? In order to advance <br />some of the issues discussed in this memorandum, review of offer to purchase terms, <br />density discussions, is the City willing to pay for a portion ofthese costs? <br /> <br />It is hoped that after this discussion staff will have a consensus from the Council on how to <br />proceed and the strategies related to 1he same. The new appraisal by lhe GSA is an unfortunate <br />issue but one that does not appear to be insurmountable, <br /> <br />\\Earth\PlaJming\Misc Files\TCAAP\GSA\ccstatus 6 13 05,doc <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.