My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
06-27-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:46 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:25:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />~~HILLS <br /> <br />Approved: <br />CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />MONDAY, JUNE 13,2005,7;30 P.M. <br />CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 1245 WEST HIGHWAY 96 <br /> <br />Call To Order <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski called the meeting to order at 7:30 PM. <br /> <br />Present: Mayor Aplikowski, Councilmembers: Gregg Larson, David Grant, Bfenda Holden, <br />Lois Rem <br /> <br />Absent: None <br /> <br />Staff present: City Administrator, Michelle Wolfe; Community Devclopment Director, Scott <br />Clark; Assistant to the City Administrator, Schawn Johnson <br /> <br />Closed Session <br />A closed session meeting was held to discuss GSA negotiations with the City Council from 6:00 <br />PM to 7:30 PM. <br /> <br />TCAAP Nel!otiations Discussion <br />Mayor Aplikowski reported that City Council and City staff met in a closed session from 6:00 <br />PM to 7:30 PM to discuss the negotiations with the General Service Administration (GSA) <br />regarding the TCAAP property. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Scott Clark provided an update on the TCAAP project and <br />stated that the GSA has declined the City's 35 million dollar purchase offer for the property. <br />Also, the City's current agreement with CRR has expired and thcrefore the City does not have <br />any in-coming escrow revenue for this project at this time. He reported that the GSA will have <br />to go through the land appraisal process a second time due to the passing of the June 1st <br />negotiation deadline. Community Development Clark proposed the following steps be discussed <br />by the City Council to consider how they would like to move forward with the TCAAP project at <br />this time: <br /> <br />I. Is the City Council in agreement with continued support of the TCAAP redevelopment? <br />2. Based on the assumption that a GSA reappraisal of the property will take four months or <br />more to finalize, does the City want to place the project on hold and do nothing during <br />this period of time, or docs the City Council want to advance various component parts <br />of the process? <br />. The three processes that could be advanced during this time pcriod are: <br />I. Request that the Army completes a draft FOSET document; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.