09-26-05 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e . e Mr, Rehbein indicated that CRR wants to stay involved, and help move along the project. He stated that they think a discussion regarding density would be of value, and having that discussion without pressure could help the process. He suggested that they go out and look at projects, This could be something accomplished with very little expense, although it would be helpful to have some involvement from DSU. He also agreed that working with the Congressional delegation would be helpful. He noted another issue, which is the use of Mike Comadeca's time. Overall, he felt we should go forward with things that don't cost much money but position us well. Mr. Clark stated that other discussions might include transportation, density/product types, sports facility, National Guard plans/issues, and the Congressional delegation involvement. Mr. Knutson questioned what the group would like to see happen at tbe June 30 meeting with the GSA. For example, he stated that we will want to find out when the appraisal will be completed and when the FOSET will be available for review by the City, Mr. Clark noted that the June 30 meeting is not a negotiation meeting, It is an opportunity to discuss issues and come to an understanding. He stated that the City needs to know why GSA had certain terms in the "Offer to Purchase", and understand why they were included. Mr. Larson stated that we may need to consider an extension of the Interim Agreement with CRR Councilmember Holden noted that on June 30, there should be a discussion regarding the definition of "highest and best use", She also noted that there should be discussion regarding issues with comparable properties used in the appraisal process. Councilmember Grant stated that the different between "improved" and "unimproved" is also important. Other topics suggested included the Offer to Purchase document, the FOSET and Response Action Agreement status, and the railroad spur, CounciImembers Holden and Larson stated that the City should start the meeting with a position statement, noting how dissatisfied the City was with the process and listing concerns. Mr. Clark noted he was concerned with starting a public meeting that way, since it puts GSA in a defensive position, Councilmembers Holden and Larson both stated that they felt making such a statement was important, and that the City needs to outline what hasn't happened that should have, noting reasons why things haven't advanced on this project. Councilmember Grant agreed, and said that we don't want to give GSA a free pass, He indicated that we don't have to be mean about it, but we should go back and recap the history so far. Mr. Clark summarized that the goals for the June 30 meeting were to (I) discuss the definition of highest and best use; and (2) set deadlines,