My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-26-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
09-26-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:46 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:25:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />at It was noted that, technically, thc property is not currently zoned, <br /> <br />On the discussion of land use by acres, Mr. Mueller's numbers werc rccapped: <br />. 200 acres single family with 2,S lots per acre <br />. lS0 acres town homes, 6 units/acre <br />. SO/30 acres high density housing, 12 units/acre <br /> <br />GSA indicated they may amend their appraisal instructions to ask for two outcomes: one <br />with and one without the athletic fields and wildlife corridor. <br /> <br />Mr. Bakken stated that he could provide a summary of his conclusions regarding highest <br />and best use in one week (a deadline of 9/1S was set), Mr. Miller will also submit his <br />findings in writing by that time, The parties will meet again my conferencc call on <br />Tuesday, Scptember 20 at 2:00 ET (I :00 CST), <br /> <br />Aftcr a break, some members reconvened for further discussion about other TCAAP- <br />related topics, (The appraisers were no longer present), <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Phil Youngberg, GSA, said that he had reviewed the MEPA process and that it is very <br />similar in many ways to NEP A. The NEP A process is fairly compact, sincc the federal <br />government intcnds to transfcr the propcrty, They will draw a lot from MEP A, which <br />will be more lengthy and detailed, The GSA's position is to partner with the City, and <br />extract what they need from our MEP A process, They will participate as necessary in <br />public meetings, They will endorse our mitigation plan, working out differcnces ahead of <br />time, The GSA indicated that they can work within our 120-day time line, They are <br />ready to get "plugged-in" to the process at any time, All they need to look at in thcir <br />NEP A proccss is the question of dispose or not dispose (of the property), <br /> <br />In tenns of timeline, it is hoped that these processes can start in early 2006, The GSA <br />would like to kick offwith a scoping letter, but suggested that perhaps there can be ajoint <br />letter kicking off both MEP A and NEP A. DSU indicated that they can share their <br />mailing list with GSA, <br /> <br />The next topic discussed was the status of tile GSA's survey of the site, Kevin Legare <br />stated that a draft is completed and available, they are in the process of putting in legal <br />description. <br /> <br />The GSA has researched the issue of easements, and concluded that there is no real issue <br />with any easements, including Xeel Energy, <br /> <br />CRR was asked ifthey had completed their comments regarding the tenns of the Offer to <br />Purchase document. They indicated that tiley would complete and forward soon to GSA. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.