Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session Meeting <br />December 19, 2005 <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />City Council V acancy- The deadline for submitting applications for the vacant City Council seat <br />is December 29th. Members of the City Council tentatively scheduled interviews for the City <br />Council candidates on January 20th in the afternoon. <br /> <br />New Enl!ineer: City Enl!ineer Status-City Administrator Wolfe stated that with the new Civil <br />Engineer is scheduled to start in early January; in the meantime, the City will need to designate <br />an official engineer for the City. At this time, there are two options for City Council to consider: <br />(I) Appoint the City of Roseville's Engineer as our City Engineer; or (2) Continue with URS as <br />our official City Engineer. Staffs recommendation is that the City appoints the Roseville City <br />Engineer as Arden Hills City Engineer. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked what will happen to the 2006 PMP Project if we switch Civil <br />Engineers. <br /> <br />City Administrator Wolfe said that the Roseville City Engineer would be responsible for <br />reviewing the plans and signing off on the final documents. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson is concerned that the City will be losing some of its continuity and <br />should not be getting rid ofURS at this time. <br /> <br />City Administrator Wolfe said that the Civil Engineer will be working very closely with URS. <br />The new civil engineer will be giving work direction to URS and representing the needs of the <br />City. <br /> <br />Majority of the members of the City Council agreed that the City should designate the City of <br />Roseville's Civil Engineer as the City's official engineer of record. <br /> <br />Fund Transfer Discussion <br /> <br />Finance Director Murtuza Siddiqui provided the City Council with a verbal update on the City's <br />fund transfers for the 2005 fiscal budget. In 2005, the City anticipated to transfer general fund <br />dollars to the capital equipment and public safety funds. Due to unexpected clean-up costs from <br />the September thunderstorm, the City will be using reserve funds to cover the projected deficit in <br />the general fund balance. The deficit in the general fund balance will result in a decrease in the <br />dollar amount that will available to the City for future capital improvement projects. Finance <br />Director Siddqui asked the City Council if they would like to transfcr City reserves to the City's <br />public safety and capital equipment funds to offset the projected difference. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant said that he has no desire to transfer funds at this time. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson said that the City may have to use general fund dollars to offset deficits <br />in the capital equipment or public safety funds in the future. <br />