CCP 02-13-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e . e The Staff has reviewed this proposal in accordance with the variance criteria and believes hardship is present. The proposal to construct on addition onto the south side of the home is reasonable due to the lot characteristics, neighborhood and interior floor plan. The situation is unique due to the small lot area, frontage on two roadways, topography of the lot and character of the neighborhood. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the variance to the City Council subjcct to the following: 1. The project must be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as part of the Variancc application. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, will require rcvicw and approval by the Planning Commission. 2. The variance shall automatically expire and become void one (1) ycar from and after the date on which the Council granted such approval if work on the project has not begun within that time period. OPTIONS I. Recommend approval as submitted. 2. Recommend approval with conditions. 3. Recommend denial with reasons for denial. If the City denies the pctitioners request, "it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it dcnies the request". 4. Tahle for additional information. DEADLINE FOR AGENCY ACTION: February 2, 2006 The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on December 2, 2005. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request hy February 2,2006 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. The City may with the petitioner's consent extend the review period beyond the 120 days. Attachments I) Location Map 2) Statement ofrequest submitted by applicant 3) Final Plat 4) Grading and Drainage Plan 5) Rice Creek Permit 6) Public Use Dedication Fee Payment Plan