My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 02-21-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 02-21-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:18 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:42:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Auditor Selection Process <br />2/16/2006 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />. Field work is smooth and less taxing on staff. <br /> <br />Cons: <br /> <br />. Unless an organization bids, it never knows if they are receiving a competitive price. It <br />may force the current auditor to give a lower price for retention purposes. <br />. A long-term finance employee can learn the auditor's audit techniques and can work to <br />their benefit. <br />. An organization may not receive a fresh perspective if they receive services from the <br />same auditor year after year. A standardized treatment. <br /> <br />If the City chooses to place an RFP for audit services, the process should start in early summer <br />and concluded no later than the end of summer, with selection made no later than the start of fall. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff is providing Council information for the Council to solicit an RFP for the City's Annual <br />Audit Services. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.