My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-13-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 03-13-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:20 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:09:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />~ <br />~ILLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />March 6, 2006 <br /> <br />Agenda Item 6,A <br /> <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br /> <br />FROM: James Lehnhoff, City Planner) t <br /> <br />SUBJECT: PC #06-005 <br />Riehard Kotoski <br />2015 Thorn Drive <br />Minor Subdivision & Varianee <br /> <br />Backl!round <br /> <br />The applicant is requesting a minor subdivision of a .70 acre property at 2015 Thom Drive in the <br />R-2 Zone. Parcel A, a comer lot, is proposed to be 95 feet by 174 feet for a total area of 16,530 <br />square feet. The minimum lot width for a lot in the R-2 Zone is typically 85 feet; however, <br />Section 1130.07 Subd. 8 of the City Code of Ordinances requires comer lots to be ten feet wider <br />than the minimum lot width for a particular zone. In this case, the minimum lot width is 95 feet <br />for the comer lot. <br /> <br />Parcel B, the interior lot, is proposed to be 81 feet by 173 for a total area of 14,013 square feet. <br />The minimum lot width for interior lots is 85 feet; therefore, a variance is required to create a <br />non-confomling lot due to substandard lot width. <br /> <br />The applicant proposes to demolish the existing dwelling and accessory structure. A letter has <br />been submitted detailing the basis for the variance request. <br /> <br />For additional background information, please refer to the March 1,2006, Planning Case report. <br />This report is available online at <br />})tto://www.ci.ar.4en-hiHs.rnn.us/CopncilandCommittc~51P]a1UlingCommission/Mar06PC."Q.!m_ <br /> <br />P1anninl! Commission Recommendation <br /> <br />At their March 1,2006, meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case #06-005 and <br />voted unanimously to recommend denial of the variance based on the three following findings <br />of fact: <br />I. Thc hardship is based on an inconvenience. The property currently has reasonable use <br />and can accommodate a single-family dwelling that is comparable to others in the <br />\\Metro-inel.lls\ardenhills'Planning\Planning Cases12006106-005 Kotoski minor subdivision and variance (PENDING) 1030206 CC Reporl- <br />Kotoski Minor Subdivision & Variance. floc <br /> <br />Page 1 of3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.