My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-13-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 03-13-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:20 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:09:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />James Lehnhoff <br />Planner, City of Arden Hills <br /> <br />February 6, 2006 <br /> <br />Dear Mr_ Lehnhoff: <br /> <br />I am requesting a variance for a lot split that would produce a conforming <br />comer lot of 95'xI74', 16,530 square feet and an 81'x174', 14,094 square <br />foot lot. The only variance needed is for the width of the 81 foot lot. The <br />square footage is tar above code requirements. The minimum building pad <br />for this lot with a 9 foot side set on each side would be 63 feet wide which is <br />more than satisfactory. The maximum building pad size for the conforming <br />95 foot comer lot is 49 feet wide_ Functionally the 81 foot wide lot is fine. <br /> <br />I am aware that to the north and adjoining this property are two 50 foot wide <br />lots, each with single family homes on them. <br /> <br />This entire lot is conforming under R2 for a twinhome use and would require <br />a special use permit. Though confident that we could provide a twinhome <br />site that would fit all the city's requirements, I would prefer both tor myself <br />and the neighborhood, two single family structures. <br /> <br />The site currently has a 1 1, story home, breezeway, attached garage, and a <br />two car detached garage, all of which are pushed to the north edge of the <br />property. <br /> <br />All structures are in need of repair, some of which is significant. I believe <br />that removing these structures and placing two aesthetically pleasing single <br />family homes on this lot would be a benefit to this neighborhood. <br /> <br />The front of the homes would face the railroad tracks to the south and deep <br />backyards would provide aesthetic and open spacing to the surrounding <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />I make this request with the knowledge that a twinhome ou this site is within <br />the conforming use in the R2 zoning. 1 would state that the building of a <br />twinhome and not being able to build two single family homes is a hardship <br />and is unique to this property because of it's size and R2 zoning. <br /> <br />~lH <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br />BURNET <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.