Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />On April 1111', City staff received a price quote from Cities Digital for the implementation and <br />scanning of the City's historical documents, GIS maps, building plans, finaneial documents, City <br />Council minutes/agendas, and other important documents that must be protected and saved by <br />the City. The estimated cost for completing the entire document imaging project is $53,053.80, <br />plus $5,000 for a high eapacity dedicated server. In 2005, the City budgeted $36,000 for <br />beginning the document imaging process. This was primarily the cost for aequiring the software <br />and cquipment, excluding labor eosts. <br /> <br />Overall, the City has three options: I. Outsourcing; 2. In-housing Imaging; 3. Status Quo <br /> <br />Outsoureing is estimated to cost $60,000; In-housing Imaging is estimated to eost $50,000; and <br />Status Quo will cost nothing. The advantages of document imaging were previously diseussed. <br /> <br />The cost difference between outsourcing and in-housing imaging is minimal when compared to <br />risk of organizing the documents incorrectly and taking the existing staff resources away from <br />their routine responsibilities. Also, by outsourcing, the year one project can be completed within <br />a two week period. <br /> <br />In 2006, staff reeommends spending approximately $40,000 on the implementation of this <br />project. This would include the acquisition of integration software, limited hardware, training, <br />and actual scanning of historical documents in the Community Development (Building & <br />Plarming) Department. The documents included are maps, blue prints, planning cases, permits, <br />etc... In 2007, City staff recommends the completion of the document imaging projeet by <br />. budgeting $20,000 for scanning Finanee, City Council, and Election related doeuments. <br /> <br />It should be noted that the 2006 Budget does not have any funds budgeted for this purpose. <br />Funds werc budgeted in 2005; however, due to other pending priorities this projeet was not <br />undertaken. There was a Council discussion about carrying over the funds into 2006. A Council <br />deeision was made to amend the budget when the City is prepared implement this project. A <br />Council action to proceed with this project would requirc a budget amendment to the general <br />fund in the amount of $40,000. The remaining $20,000 will be budgeted in 2007. <br /> <br />Reeommendation: <br />Staffrecommends that the City Council authorize staff to utilize the serviees proposed by Cities <br />Digital at an estimated total cost of $53,000 with an understanding that the project will be <br />divided appropriately between the two fiscal years. <br /> <br />Also, staff recommends amending the 2006 General Fund Budget in the amount of $40,000. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3 <br />