Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL ~AUGUST 28, 2006 <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />the south would get into the development. He believed this development would create a lot of <br />accidents in the area. He stated the traffic patterns should bc considered in a lot more detail and a <br />lot more care before they approved this. He believed this development was too large and would <br />be landlocked. He stated they were taking too much risk with respect to traffic to approve this <br />project at this time. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Jan Stodola, 1281 Karth Lake Circle, stated she has had business dealings with Marcel <br />Eibenhsteiner and she was impressed with his work. She noted she has lived in the City for 25 <br />years. She stated this proposed development was wrong for this location. She stated many <br />rcsidents at the Planning Commission expressed concern about the loss of trees, loss of wildlife, <br />increascd traffic, etc. She agreed thcre would be no degradation in the traffic because the <br />intersection was already rated at an "F". She stated what would change though is the length of <br />time people would have to wait to make turns off of and onto Hamline Avenue. She stated the <br />rcsidents did not mind developing this property, but this particular usage was wrong. She stated <br />the residcnts worked very hard on this and she encouraged the developer to come up with a <br />different usage fot this property. She stated this was not the only usage for this land and <br />encouraged the City to look at this further and listen to the passion of the residents. <br /> <br />Elwood Caldwell, 1451 Arden View Drive, representing the Board of Directors of Arden <br />Hills North Homes Association, stated they have looked at the latest sign proposal and they <br />wanted the signage reduced per their recommendation. He requested they strike the permission <br />for extra signage on the north side of buildings 19-23 and replace condition 25 with their <br />recommended condition. He recommended they look at their comments regarding gutters and <br />downspouts. He stated while they were not happy about having the development, if this parcel <br />gcts developed, he encouraged them to keep their concerns and recommendations in mind. <br /> <br />tit <br /> <br />Mr. Lehnhoff stated he had discussed gutters and downspouts with the City Engineer and it was <br />determined it would probably not make a difference, but they could accommodate either one. <br /> <br />Jim Hartso, President of Townhouse Villages Homeowners Association, stated their only <br />access to get out was on Hamline Avenue and at 7:30 a,m. they had to wait at least five minutes to <br />get out of their development. He expressed concern that this development would add to that <br />congestion. He stated the development was fine, but should be more limited than it was. <br /> <br />Gerry Guzi, 1266 Nursery Hill Lane, stated this development did not work at this location. He <br />statcd this would be a nightmare for traffic and it would be a pedestrian safety issue. <br /> <br />I.,arry Stark stated the kinds of businesses going into this development would bring into the City <br />a lot of people who were not from the area and with the strange traffic flow they were proposing, <br />people would get lost and create a lot more accidents. <br /> <br />Jeanine Yates, 1394 Arden View Drive, stated she has almost gotten hit twice because people <br />going south did not like the fact that people were turning right onto Arden View and passed them <br />in the turning lane. She stated there was so much opposition that that she felt the Council needed <br />to listen to the residents. She stated traffic would get worse with this development. Mayor <br />Aplikowski stated Council was listening and they acknowledged there was a traffic issue in this <br />area. <br /> <br />. <br />