My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-27-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 03-27-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:26 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:09:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MARCH 13,2006 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />mistake. She stated at the moment, she was in favor of this. She believed if they did not do this <br />now, they would never do it. <br /> <br />CounciImember Grant noted when they originally discussed this they had the funds to pay for <br />it, but now they did not have the funds. He believed there were good points brought up here and <br />in an ideal world he wished they had all of thc funds they had when they first started looking at <br />this. He noted staff was pulling items off of the CIP. <br /> <br />Mr. Siddiqui stated that some initial concems of staff were that bids they had received for the <br />lift stations were higher than expected. He noted there were concems about incurring costs that <br />were not anticipated when they go into the Ridgewood neighborhood project. He stated that the <br />other unknown for the five year CIP is the City's Inflow and Infiltration (III) issues. <br /> <br />Ms. Wolfe noted they have a number of competing issues, such as III, lift stations and <br />infrastructure, but the sewer and water funds could not be used for this project. She noted MSA <br />funds have been impacted by the Lexington Avenue project costing more than anticipated. With <br />further analysis of MSA and capital funds, they started looking at needs versus wants. When <br />projects were moved to "unassigned" in the CIP, it was her determination that some projects <br />were more wanted projects rather than needed projects. Funds are available, but it may result in <br />delaying other proj ects. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson believed it was their job to balance priorities and he did not believe this <br />was any different than any othcr decisions that came before them. He stated Highway 96 has <br />been done for two years and this rose to the level whcrc it was important to finish this project off <br />and move on to other things. <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Pellegrin seconded a <br />motion to adopt Resolution 06-27: Approval of thc final plans and <br />specifications and authorization for bids for the Highway 96 Landscaping <br />Improvement Project. The motion carried 3-2 (Councilmembers Holden <br />and Grant opposed). <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL REPORTS <br /> <br />Ms. Wolfc - None. <br /> <br />CounciImember Holdcn - Stated Northwcst Youth and Family Services Leadership still had <br />space available at the table. <br /> <br />CouuciImember Grant - Nonc. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson - None. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pellegrin - Asked staff to provide him information on the 800 megahertz <br />. meetings when it is received. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.