My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 04-10-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 04-10-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:26 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:09:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />City Council Work Session Meeting <br />March 20, 2006 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant requested that City staff review the assessment policy and work on <br />obtaining a history of the Beach Club property from some of the members. <br /> <br />URS Engineer Greg Brown stated that reconfiguration of private driveways will not be necessary <br />for this PMP project. There is a possibility that a retaining wall and a few trees may have to be <br />removed for reconstructing the roadway. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden said that she is concerned about the City's five year CIP. The <br />Ridgewood project will be very large and expensive project <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson said that the City will probably will have to delay future projects if we <br />proceed with the 2006 PMP project, but we will have to evaluate proposed projects on a year to <br />year basis. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant requested a future discussion regarding the five year CIP plan. <br /> <br />City Administrator Wolfe said that most likely all ofthe projects on the five-year CIP list cannot <br />be completed as projected. The City will have to revise the list of projects that will be delayed or <br />pushed into the future. <br /> <br />City Commissions, Committees, and Task Forces <br />City Administrator Michelle Wolfe provided the City Council with an overview of the City <br />commissions, committees, and task force discussion. Last year, the City Council indicated a <br />desire to review the structure and procedures for various City commissions, committees, and task <br />forces. Currently, the City does not have a consistent process regarding the operation, formation, <br />and appointing of new members. Mayor Aplikowski and City Administrator Wolfe began to <br />review the City's past practices, committee structures, and by-laws from other communities. <br /> <br />A document was provided that identifies existing committee/commissions and task forces by <br />providing some discussion points and different types of committees. City staff is seeking City <br />Council's input regarding the proposed commission, committee, and task force structure. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden raised concerns that some commissions and committees have access to a <br />secretary. She does not believe that the PTRC should be allowed to use the recording secretary. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson agreed with Councilmember Holden's concern that the PTRC should not <br />have a meeting secretary. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden raised concerns about the three year rotating temlS for commission and <br />committee members. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson also expressed concern about the tcrm limits. How would the City <br />appoint new members and what happens if we have openings that are not being filled. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.