Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2006 PMP Update <br />4/13/2006 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A, Residential Equivalent Assessment Rate <br /> <br />All R-l and R-2 residentially zoned properties with frontage abutting a street that is overlaid <br />with bituminous surfacing shall be assessed on a per unit basis at the residential equivalent <br />assessment rate. <br /> <br />This rate shall apply, regardless of the street's classification (local, collector, arterial, trunk <br />highway); designation (County State-Aid Highway, Municipal State-Aid Street); or <br />Jurisdiction (State, County or City). <br /> <br />The residential equivalent assessment rate shall be based on fifty percent (50%) of the cost of <br />bituminous overlay plus all associated overhead costs for a typical residential street section. <br />This residential equivalent assessment rate shall be determined by the City Council. <br /> <br />Based on the current engineer's estimate, 50% of the roadway improvements amounts to <br />$571,369.57. The assessment per property is dependent upon the total number of units to be <br />assessed. Staffis seeking guidance from Council on how some of the properties in the <br />neighborhood should be incorporated into the assessment roll. <br /> <br />TIle preliminary assessment roll in the feasibility report included 62 assessable units within . <br />the Ridgcwood Neighborhood. Several parcels were not included in this base number <br />because, although the parcels do abut the streets to be improved, the parcels currently do not <br />use the streets as their access to the property. Staff would like to reserve the right to assess <br />any parcel in the future should it be developed or redeveloped with access to any of the roads <br />within the project. The following is an excerpt from the Assessment Policy: <br /> <br />1. Land Not Included in Assessment <br /> <br />The City may resen'e the right to delete land within the assessable area from the assessment <br />roles if, in its opinion, the land cannot be developed and/or the improvement does not <br />provide benefit, No development of that property shall be permit/ed, nor shall any physical <br />connection to the City's utility or drainage facilities be made by any development on that <br />property until the assessment or connection fees are paid. <br /> <br />The following additional properties were listed as potential assessable units and need to be <br />considered prior to preparing the final assessment roll. Attached for your review is the <br />assessment rate discussion (page ]6) from the feasibility report as well as a map of the area, <br />which included the parcels described below. <br /> <br />Arden Hills Island Beach CJut. <br />The initial concept of this properly equaling ]2 units was based on dividing the total front <br />footage of the property (approximately 1200 feet) by an average lot width of 100 feet. Since . <br />the initial concept, staff has looked into the history of the Beach Club and the parcels owned <br />by the Beach Club. The following infonnation was retrieved: <br />