My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 05-08-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 05-08-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:31 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:09:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. Site Overview <br /> <br />1. Setbacks - Does not meet requiremenl. <br /> <br />'Ibe rcar setback for principal buildings in the R-I district is 30 feet. <br />Thc lakeshore stnlcture setback f()r general development watcrs is 50 feet. <br /> <br /> <br />General Develo-prri"nt <br />.,":':.'.'....'..:.:-:::;"i'+;:c:<:'.!/i,?" <br />Waters Requirerrient . <br /> <br /> <br />Lakeshore Sctback <br /> <br />50' <br /> <br />57.8' <br /> <br />41' (stairs on deck) <br />45' (deck) <br />45' (house) <br /> <br />2. Lot Coverage - Exceeds Code Requirement. <br /> <br />The rcquirement for all rcsidcntial districts is a maximwn of25%. The principal <br />stmcture as proposcd in relation to the property would constitute 23 % lot covcragc. <br /> <br />3. Landscape Lot Area - Exceeds Code Requirement. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The requirement for all residential districts is a Minimum Landscape Lot Area of65%. <br />Constmetion of the addition to thc deck would leave approximately 71 % of the lot as <br />landscapc area. <br /> <br />Back2round <br /> <br />A survey by BRW from 1974, when the house was built, shows approximately 65 feet <br />between the rear of the home and Lake Johanna. A survey by E.G. Rud and Sons from <br />2003, reveals that the distance between the Lakc Johanna shoreline and the rear of the <br />home is now 57.8 feet. The applicant attemptcd to stabilize the shoreline in 1991 by <br />installing rip rap. <br /> <br />The applicant is proposing a 12-foot addition to the rear of the housc and csscntially <br />shifting the existing deck to the north. As proposcd the housc would be 45 feet from the <br />Ordinary High Water Mark (OHM), thc deck would also be 45 feet from the OHM and <br />the stairs leading to the deck would be 41 feet from the OHM. Included in the <br />infonnation that the applicant provided are two different sets of plans (Plan A, Plan B) <br />which show a slightly different layout. However, both plans appear to have the structure <br />and deck located no closer than 45 feet to the OHM and one has stairs to the deck that <br />would he no e10ser than 41 feet from the OHM. <br /> <br />The reason that thc applicant has requested the variance is that they are unablc to cxpand <br />. to eithcr side or to the front due to setback constraints. There is additional space outside <br /> <br />PC #03-19 PC Report 08/06/03 - Page 2 of (> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.