My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 05-22-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 05-22-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:35 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:10:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br />EN HILLS <br /> <br /> <br />MEMOR"'NDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />AGENDA ITEM <br /> <br />May 18, 2006 <br /> <br />7.A <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Council <br />MicheJle Wolfe, City Administrator <br /> <br />Kristine Giga, Civil Engineer ,@J/ <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />2006 PMP- Ridgcwood Neighborhood Improvemcnts <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />Bids were received and opened for the 2006 PMP Ridgewood Neighborhood Improvements on May II, <br />2006. Bids were received from three (3) contractors. The tabulated bid outcome is as follow" <br /> <br />Contractor <br />I. Amt Construction <br />2, Park Construction <br />3. Forest Lake Contracting <br />Engineer's Est imate <br /> <br />Bid Amount <br />$1,808,584.32 <br />$2,122,109.99 <br />$2,197,306.20 <br />$] ,651,807.58 <br /> <br />All bids included proper bid guarantees in the amount often percenl (l 0%) of the total bid as required by <br />the Project Manual. Bid amounts were verified by creating a bid tabulation. \vhich is attached for your <br />infonnation. Amt Construction submitted the low bid with a total bid amount of $1 ,808,584.32. <br /> <br />FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS <br /> <br />fhe low bid is approximately $289,625.90 higher than the Engineer's Estimate and $437,894.32 higher <br />than the Feasibility Estimate. TIle stonn sewer and watermain pnces were signdkanlly higher than <br />estimated, resulting in the majority of the increase. Bituminous costs also contributed to the incrc8se in <br />roadway costs. Engineering costs for the project are estimated at $393,3] 0, resul1ing in a total project cost <br />of $2,201 ,894,32. <br /> <br />Any expenses that may still be required for drainage easement acquisition are not included in this amount. <br />The City's portion ofthc project costs are currently budgeted ham the General Capital Fund and Utility <br />Enterprise Funds (sanitary sewer, storm sewer and watcffi1ain funds). The following shows a breakdown <br />and comparison of iCasibility estimates, engineer's estimate based on the final plans, and the lcnv bid. <br />Engineering costs are included in the total mTIounts. <br /> <br />'Mctro-incI.us'"udenhills'J>R&PW'-FngincojJ)g'2006"CollnciJ :\cliuns5- J 8-06 Mel110 2006 PMP.dm: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.