Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 3, 2006 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />,...... <br />I..L, <br /><! <br />Ot:: <br />a <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />PLANNING CASE #06-013: VARIANCE & PRELIMINARY PLAT; AMITIES <br />COAST LLC; 3685 & 3695 NEW BRIGHTON ROAD <br /> <br />ML Lehnhoff stated the applicants were requesting a preliminary plat to reconfigure two <br />existing lots at 3685 and 3695 New Brighton Road into four new lots. The request also <br />includes a variance to allow the four lots to share one private driveway to New Brighton <br />Road and for Lots 2 and 3 to not directly abut tbe public right-of-way, He reviewed his <br />analysis and noted the lots in the proposed subdivision meet or exceed all of the <br />requirements of the underlying R-2 zone with three of the four lots more than double the <br />minimum lot size required for the R-2 zone, With the recommended conditions, this <br />subdivision is unlikely to have any negative impact on the City or the neighborhood. He <br />indicated while thc City certainly preferred one driveway instead of four, the question <br />was whether a private drive should be pcrmitted instead of the traditionally required <br />street and cul-de-sac, He stated therc was a precedent for using private streets in <br />developments; however, those examples can only be found in PUD's where private <br />streets wcre pemlitted, However, since this private street was unlikely to have a negative <br />impact on the neighborhood and since the cul-de-sac would add comparatively little value <br />to the City or the neighborhood, staff recommended approval of the variance, The City <br />Engineer and Fire Marshal had revicwed the proposed private street and had not stated <br />any objections to the private driveway. <br /> <br />He stated once the preliminary plat was approved by the Ci1y, no additional conditions <br />related to the design of the preliminary plat could be added, The final plat was simply a <br />review process to ensure that the changcs required in the preliminary plat had been made. <br />He recommcnded approval based on the following seventeen conditions: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />The applicant shall submit the final plat and application to tile City of <br />Arden Hills within three months of the preliminary plat approval date or <br />thc approval shall expirc, <br />The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as <br />part of the preliminary plat and variance application, Any significant <br />changes to these plans, as determined by thc City Planner, shall require <br />review and approval by the Planning Commission, <br />The applicant shall include a 12-foot drainage and utility easement <br />centered on all common lot lines, and a 12-foot drainage and utility <br />easement along the right-of-way, <br />The applicant shall pay a park dedication fec as detemlined by the City <br />Council at the time the final plat is approvcd, <br />The applican1 shall amend the final plat to be in confonnance with all of <br />the comments from the April 19,2006 memo from the City EngineeL <br />Any extension of City services for the new lot shall be subject to review <br />and approval by the City Engineer and all associated costs shall be the <br />responsibility of the applicant. <br />Erosion control measures shall bc installed before any grading or <br />construction begins and shall bc maintained and remain in place until <br />groundcover is reestablishcd and conslruction is finished. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />~ <br />~. <br /> <br />4, <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />7. <br />