My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-26-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 06-26-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:39 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:10:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />URS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Thresher Square <br />700 Third Street South <br />Minneapolis, MN 55415 <br />Phone: (612) 370-0700 <br />Fax: ((>12) 370-1378 <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />J(ris Giga/ <br />City of Arden Hills <br /> <br />Michelle Wolfe/AH <br />Frank Ticknor/URS <br /> <br />F'ile: <br /> <br />37951005 <br /> <br />Copy: <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Greg Bro\,'n <br />Project Manager <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br />May 30, 2006 <br /> <br />Snbject: <br /> <br />3153 Shoreline Lane Driveway <br /> <br />Background: <br />As a part of the 2004 PMI' Ridgewood l1eighborhood reeonstmctiol1 project, the driveway at 3] 53 <br />Shoreline Lane was reconstructed in October of 2004. The roa(hvay pavement elevation was designed to <br />match the preexisting roadway centerline in the area oflhis property. The new curb and driveway apron <br />elevation did result in a situation which caused the driveway at 3153 to become flatter than its preexisting <br />condition (0.3% vs. approximate original grade of 0.5%). <br /> <br />The URS field inspector discussed this situalion with the hODlU)\VnCr a1 the time of initial construction <br />and recommended that a concrete drivev..'3Y be constructed to better accommodate the flatter grade. The <br />homeoyvner preferreclthe look of bituminous and, as a result. the driveway \vas reconstructed with <br />bitnminous. Although the Contrilctor brought in a special crew and took cxtra eff0l1 to constmct the <br />hituminous driveway, some mil10r settlemel1t occurred after the spril1g thaw il1 2005. It is URS opil1iol1 <br />that the level of quality pcrformcd by the contractor met il1dustry standards and that the cOl1tractor should <br />not be penalized for the minor settJcrnents \vhich have oecurrcd. <br /> <br />Thcse areas \vere patched \vith hituminous fines during the spring of2005, however, additional Inlnor <br />settlemcnt continued to occur over the remainder of the summer 2005 and spril1g of 2006. includil1g a <br />small hole near the garage apron. The hole near the apron \vas filJed \vith a small amount ofbiturrllnous <br />mix hy the URS inspector in May, 2006, however, 110 addiliol1al patching has occurred sil1ce the spril1g of <br />2005. <br /> <br />The approximate driveway dimel1sions ore 38' dcep and 60' wide (at curb) totalil1g 2280 SF or <br />approximately 250 square yards. The Hat slope area which has experienced the settlemcnt areas represcnts <br />approximately the northern 60% (36') of the driveway. TIle southern 24' is functioning satistactorily hom <br />a drainage perspective_ Based upon our field review last fall and this spring, we would not reconnnend <br />any reconstruction work for the s-OUthC111 24' of the driveway. <br /> <br />Mark Lynch, frank Ticknor and I met with the homco\vncr May 18th to review the situation again and <br />discuss options. The follO\ving are the options for the City to consider: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.