My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-26-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 06-26-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:39 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:10:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Memo to Michelle Wolfe <br />September 20, 2005 <br />]4]5 Glenhill Rd. & 3150 Hamline Ave <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />moving the material out ofthe storage building to the fann but it will take some time and that <br />they plan on selling the Hamlinc property in a couple of years. They also will take care ofthe <br />motor home but not until this coming spring and summer. She also notes that other properties <br />have motor homes in violation, particularly on Ingerson Rd. <br /> <br />June 4th, 2004 <br />City staff writes the owner reminding that her November 24th letter stated she would be selling <br />the motor home in the spring/summer. Staff cites all of the violations remaining on the property, <br />noting that some are still outstanding from 2000. Staff gives her until the 6th of July to abate the <br />violations. <br /> <br />July 1 st, 2004 <br />The owner responds to the above letter stating she is not well. She also writes that they are <br />planning on selling the property, but not for a couple of years. <br /> <br />Septembcr 29th, 2004 <br />City staff writes letter to owner regarding a roofing permit for the storage building. <br />Staff writes that in earlier communications to her that the storage building was unsafe and that <br />the work now done to it does not change the unsafe condition. <br />Staff notes; Stairs unsafe for human travel, Rotted wood on walls in all areas, Rotted wood on <br />walls in all areas of roo l' visible from the underside of eaves, Rotted wood at tail ends ofroof <br />joists, New roof decking was installed & unable to determine how it was attached to rotten joists, <br />Stmcture still appears to be a harborage for rodents, Stmcture is still in general disrepair <br />including fencing attached to stmcture, Trees growing thru fence. <br />Staff states for all of the above reasons the structure is still unsafe and needs to be repaired or <br />removed. <br /> <br />In addition to the above correspondence City Staff has had numerous phone conversations and <br />on site inspections over the years. <br /> <br />Lel!al Action <br />Attached is a list of recent court action taken on the above properties, <br />Following is a summary of those actions. <br />On August 4110 01'2004 the City did write two citations (one for each property) for the above <br />violations. <br />After many delays, continuances, and a plea of not guilty the owner did appear in court on the <br />13th of July 01'2005. The owner plead guilty to having a vchicle that is unlicensed and <br />inoperable, an R V parked in the front yard unlicensed and inoperable, and a structure that is <br />unsafe or in disrepair as of August 4\10 of 2004. <br />The City agreed to stay imposition and sentencing as long as the owner followed the timetable to <br />abate the violations according to the prearranged "compliance agreement" which is attached. <br />The brush pile and pick-up have been removed, and the brown vehicle is licensed and appears <br />operab I e. The R V and the unsafe structure remain. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.