My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-26-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 06-26-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:39 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:10:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />~HILLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />June 19,2006 <br /> <br />CC Agenda Item 8.A <br /> <br />TO: Mayor & City Council <br /> <br />FROM: J ames Lehnhoff, City Planner <br /> <br />SUBJECT: PC #: 06-014 <br />Updated Sign Code <br /> <br />Backl!round <br /> <br />Over the last several years, a lawyer from Georgia has been working with various sign <br />companies to find new locations to construct billboards along major highways in many states. <br />The proposed billboards have been reported to be as high as five to seven stories and have <br />included the "tri-vision" type, which is a billboard with rotating panels (an example of this type <br />of billboard can be found inside the Metrodome). However, many cities do not pemlit new <br />billboards or permit billboards of that size. The City of Arden Hills docs not permit the <br />construction of new billboards. <br /> <br />Despite the restrictions on billboards in many cities, the lawyer applies for the sign permit with <br />the expectation of denial. Once denied, the lawyer files a lawsuit against the city claiming that <br />the sign regulations are unconstitutional and should be deemed unenforceable. If the sign <br />regulations are deemed unconstitutional, a city may be obligated to approve the billboards or <br />come to a negotiated settlement. <br /> <br />While the results of the lawsuits have been mixed, the sign regulations in some cities and <br />counties have been deemed unconstitutional because sign content was inadvertently regulated. <br />Without going into great legal detail, a city cannot regulate the content of a sign and, generally <br />speaking, cannot show preferential treatment toward signs based on content. Cities that exempt <br />selected signs from the sign regulations or show preference for a type of sign based on content <br />are at risk of having their sign regulations deemed unconstitutional. An exemption for for-rent, <br />for-sale, or even religious signs has been construed to be a form of regulating content. Due to <br />these types of exemptions, the cities of Hopkins and Eden Prairie have faced lawsuits <br />challenging their sign regulations, More than 100 lawsuits have been filed nationwide, some of <br />which are ongoing and costly. <br /> <br />Although Arden Hills has not received any requests [or new billboards, the City's frontage on <br />Interstate 35W, Interstate 694, US Highway 10, and Highway 96 makes this an important issue. <br /> <br />\\lvletro-inet.us\ardenhil1s\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-014 Sign Code (PENDING)\06200G - CC reporl- Sib~ ordinance.doc <br /> <br />Page 1 of5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.