Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DRAFT - ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION ~ AUGUST 2, 2006 <br /> <br />]4 <br /> <br />Richard Roessler, 1261 Nursery Hill Lane, stated he agreed with Mr. Harpstead's . <br />comments. He asked why they could not convert this development into a residential area. <br />He noted with the expansion of Boston Scientific and the County development across <br />Highway 96, it had substantially increased the lraffic on Hamline Avenue. He stated this <br />was no longer a positive thing. He was not sure the developer had the community in <br />mind when doing this. He stated he was a believer in impact statements and <br />recommcndcd they look at this and not approve it now, but rather make il more <br />community minded and do it in such a way as to "test lhe system." He recommended an <br />impact statement be done. <br /> <br />Cindy Owen, 4490 Hamline Avenue, stated she had a.c'-!ilcern about the size of the <br />property and traffic flow. She asked if anyone had Iookedl11.I1~W many residents were <br />impacted on the cast side of HamIine with respech~oaccess. Sliypoted right now their <br />main congestion was rush hour and if they putint!Jjs developmeJlt,slie believed they <br />would have traffic issues all day long. She "believed there would be no down time on <br />HamIine Avenue. She asked if they couldJ<:lOk at the\:levelopment bcingl;cduced down <br />to 40,000 square feel. She believed lhedcvelopment .\\.'astoo large. Shehoted Boston <br />Scientific would be adding onto their buildings and. th~ development of TCAAP, would <br />also put additional traffic onto Hamline A venue. Sh",stated there were a lot of questions <br />the residents had and they did notfeelthey had answers to, <br /> <br />;t:'~2?:\:/:;:, " ,"~,:." <br />Brian Densmore, 4504 Hamline Av",n.rteNQrth,stated ifTh6 Commissioners lived on <br />Hamline Avenue they would feel the:~amewayabouttl1is development as the residents <br />did. He stated he was concerned abou1.tj1eincreaseirttraffic and his neighborhood. He . <br />noted he could nOl allow his grandchildren in his front yard because of all of the traffic <br />and this concerned him. lIe believed this development would add to the traffic problems <br />they already had. He noted the average person going down Hamline was going 50-60 <br />mph. He indicated on average, he had an .accident in the front of his home once a day. <br />He believed Boston Scientific would also add to the traffic. <br /> <br />Mike Giel, 4534 Keithsorl1)rive, stated there was no workable way the roads could <br />".h"a;ndle the type of traffic lhis"development would create. He stated the intersection was <br />n6tni~de to handle this large of a development. He noted if people were coming from <br />the east, they would need to do a U-turn to get into the development while crossing two <br />lanes oftti'lffic. He noted people on Keithson Drive could not see the traffic because it <br />was below the.hilI. He stated this would be a problem for anyone driving down Highway <br />96 and HamlineAvenuc also. He noted in the wintertime he believed there would be a <br />lot of problems, He expressed concern about the cut out on Highway 96 off of Kcithson <br />was not sufficient either. He did not believe either one of the roads could tolerate this <br />type of a developmcnt. He noted this was a safety issue. <br /> <br />Chair Sand recessed the meeting at 8:36 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:43 p.m. <br /> <br />Larry Stark, 1460 Arden View Drive, presented and eXplained photographs he had taken <br />regarding the traffic issues. He stated it was frustrating to come here and be given three <br />minutes, and not know what the current plan was. He believed there should have been . <br /> <br />O~J~~,fl <br />