Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />~Rl2~~~J-IILLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />August 15, 2006 <br /> <br />CC Agenda Item 3.D <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor & City Council I <br />;J.JI <br />James Lehnhoff, City Planner r <br /> <br />PC #06-021 <br />Bruce & Kathy Hagluud <br />1450 Skiles Lane <br />Ardeu Hills, MN 55112 <br />Minor Subdivision & Variance - 3300 & 3294 Lake Johanna Blvd. <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />Consent Agenda <br /> <br />Since Planning Case 06-021 had a unanimous recommendation for approval from the Planning <br />Commission, had no objections or concems from neighboring properties, and had a full public <br />hcaring before the Planning Commission, this planning case has been placed on thc consent <br />agenda. While having a planning case on the consent agenda has not been common practice in <br />Arden Hills, non-controversial planning cases can be placed on the conscnt agenda. I fthere are <br />any open issues or questions from the City Council, the planning casc can be removed from the <br />consent agenda and considered scparately_ <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />The applicant is requesting a minor subdivision and variance to adjust thc lot line between two <br />existing lots at 3300 Lake Johanna Blvd (Parcel A) and 3294 Lakc Johanna Blvd (Parcel B). The <br />lot line adjustment will decrease the shoreline width on Parcel A by twenty feet and subsequently <br />increase the shorelinc width on Parcel B by twenty feet. Parcel B will also increase by 1071 <br />square feet. No ncw buildable lots will be created with this proposed minor subdivision. <br /> <br />The applicant has submitted a full explanation for the request (Attachmcnt 3A-l of the Planning <br />Case Report). In sum, for a number of years, the owner of Parcel B has been maintaining a <br />portion of Parcel A based on the belief that the land was actually part of Parcel B. However, <br />when Parcel A was sold and a survey was conducted, it was found that Parcel B was smaller and <br />had less shoreline than was previously believed. <br /> <br />To resolvc the misunderstanding and since the dwelling on Parcel B overlooks the landscaped <br />area on Parcel A, the applicants have come to an amicahle agreement to split a portion of the <br />1,':lvfefro-inet,lIs1,ardcllhil/sIP/anninglPfmming Cn5f's'.2006W6-021 IJa!;;iund Variance & Lot Splil (PENDING) 1,080806 - CC Report - Haglund <br />Vairance & Lot Spfit.doc <br /> <br />Page I of 4 <br />