Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Resident Comments: <br /> <br />The applicant did submit a signed list from adjacent properties supporting the variance <br />(Attachment 3A-l of the Planning Commission report), One nearby resident did submit an email <br />recommending denial of the variances. <br /> <br />Options <br /> <br />L Approve the proposal as submitted, <br />2. Approve the proposal with conditions, <br />3, Deny the application with reasons for denial, If the City denies the petitioners requcst, ".,,it <br />must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request" <br />4, Table for additional information. <br /> <br />Staff recommends using a different motion for each variance, <br /> <br />Deadline for Al!ency Actions <br /> <br />The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on September 20, <br />2006, Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, thc City must act on this request by November 20, <br />2006 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 <br />day review period. The City may with the petitioners' consent extend the review period beyond <br />the 120 days, <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> <br />7C- I Draft Planning Commission Minutes <br />7C-'1 Email from ML Lis and the resident recommending denial <br />7C-3 Report to the Planning Commission - Online at: http://www.ei.arden-hilIs.mn.us <br /> <br />\',Uelro-inet_us1ardcnhills\Plllnning\Plllnning CasesI2006\06-()30 U8 Variance fPFlVf)!NGjI!O(}]06 - CC Report - Lis Varinl1ce.doc <br />Page 3 of3 <br />