My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 02-08-1960
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1960-1969
>
1960
>
CC 02-08-1960
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 9:19:10 AM
Creation date
11/27/2006 9:03:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />� <br />� <br />13 <br />yet set that up but will be doing it as soon as this new system <br />goes into operation and whetheF they will bill quarterly or <br />monthly I don't know yet and this is a policy for the villags to <br />decide. Usually it's done on a yuarterly basis. However, when <br />the costs start d}oing up - St. Paul #or years was on a yuarterly <br />6asis and la�t ysar because we issued a1L those water rsvenue bands <br />they went on a monthly basis and when you do it-on a monthly basis <br />it doesn't appear to cost as fiUCt1. VJe wanted to show what the <br />total cost wculd be inciuding the service chax9e and assessa+ent so <br />you wculd know what the total cost wouid be to you includin9 <br />everythinq except the connection charge of $24C,C0 which is a <br />one shot deal. Of course, at the end of twenty years there would <br />be no more assessment charge along with your real estate taxes and <br />the only thing you would pay arould be the service charge then in <br />effect for the operatiorr, of the system. <br />You notfce in the heavier typs we say "only the property <br />included in the proposed sanitary sewer fmprovement No. 3 area will <br />pay the spectal assessment. Property of the vi2lage outside the <br />iiapravem�nt area <.Kill pay no asaessments whatsoever for this <br />improvement". Property outside of that improvement �ill nat <br />contrlbute one d3me toward this just as y�u who live in Improvement <br />No. 3 are contributing nothing toward Impro�ement No..l or 2 or <br />possibly 4 or 5 as the cas� may be in later years. Each proposed <br />improvement will stand on its own. '.�de find this charqe is a f�ir <br />assesment. I might say that this Council has adopted a 5;K , <br />carrying charge. Many of the communities are maving to 6� becausa <br />interast rates on bonds have gone up hightr, as you �rrell know. If <br />you go down to the bank #oday to borrow on a short term note, at <br />�ne time you couid get it at 59�. Now it's 6� and 6�. <br />Many of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.