Laserfiche WebLink
� � <br />' 20 <br />• point 3s probably almost 200 feet that would not be subject to any <br />assessment. <br />Iu42. SHURT: Assessinq is not always done simply by the bare <br />amount of sewer in fr�nt of the house. In other words. Z think a good <br />example is the Case where your sewer runs up along th� block and <br />terminates at the last house. He may have 2G feet of sewer in front <br />where the neighbor may have l00 feet, both of them having 109 foot lots. <br />I think everyone will aqree that his benefit , as long as the sewer <br />is extended far enough, is as great as the man next door. yet it <br />certainly wouldn't be equitable for the man to pay 100 feet of <br />frontage and the man next door 20,Il think yours is a somewhat <br />similar condition. <br />h-R. DOHPNER:' I think despite the £act that tfiis sewer main <br />• ends about the midd.le ofthat low part of tha saddle that I'm <br />still able to reach it from where my house is. <br />NR. SHORT: I would say this, that in making th� assessment, <br />those facts have to be taken into account by ihe people making the <br />assessment. That at the time the assessment ro1I is published <br />and you have the oppoxtunity to know the amount of money, if it <br />was your feelinq that it was improper, that is your opportunity to <br />register ywr objections. Assessments like this are normally <br />reviewed with the Village Council so they rr.ay have an opportunity <br />to judge a number of similar problems so they can see the people <br />concerned are being treated equitably. <br />f�f'i. DOi:PNER: At this time I would register in objection to <br />� the proposal. <br />N;AYOR ASHBACH: Anyone else? <br />N�i. JOHN E. DAUANEY, 110G Pioneer Building, Saint Paul: <br />