Laserfiche WebLink
� , \ <br />. �INCTLS R'r,GuIAR COu�3CIL F,�ETING, VILJAUE 0- At�DEi�; HILIS, Apz'il 10, 1961. <br />Page 2 <br />1�AYQP� ASHg4CH asked if tne proposed oi11 for a smaller Sanitary Sewer <br />District f'or nearb5* villages is passed, will it be flexible enough for <br />• Arden Iiills to join if' this is our best "out" for sewers i❑ t:�e Idorthern ::... , <br />section of our village. SeIr. Short will study this further. <br />PUBT,IC 4VOHKS CO:r�2TTh'E - ftoads are s till being tivorked on to be kept <br />passab e. <br />A hESIDEIdT AT 12�0 :�d�ewater inquired as to technicalities involved in <br />daming up a creek goin� into the lake. PSext to his property is a$ixlly <br />wiiich has been used ior storm draina�e. A lot of dirt goes from this <br />into the lake. i3is question was "could we put a series of dams in this <br />gully to sift out the dirt still a1lovJing the vrater to drain out«? b'tayor <br />Ashbach suggested he and r,is nei�nbors could do this tnemselves providing <br />they vaere causing no problem to any one else. ' <br />A RESIDENT from 3125 �lsbury asi:ed about a nearing re: roade in Arden Hills <br />#4. He questioned whether the contractor had conformed to specif'icationa <br />as presented at the hearin�. He vras �nformed the road was i�uilt as <br />specified and �rould be back tnis year to do some repairs. �'xtra surtace <br />material had been used to put up against the property.as the cut�bing was <br />turned do�un by residents as being too costly. <br />aJELIC 1�;�,LFA?'w ?3EPORT: fdir. P:ennedy r�ported hav�n� a letter dated ivIarch <br />3, �J6 from Ricnard,Iv.yers, Dr, fioule�s attorney, requesting a re-openin� <br />of the Dr. Houle project L'ecause he, N_r. i,�yers, nad been unable to attend <br />tne last one. Ivir. I:ennedy su�gested that tne clerk vrrite a letter to <br />• h'r. -,'yer•s asking if they had anytiiing new in the c ase to present to tne <br />Council. If not tne case vaould remain closed. <br />Letter of i'�iarcn 30, 1961 was received from Village attorney oF Shoreview. <br />P;iayor :�shbach will answer this letter. <br />I4ir. iiennedy ra�orted on the discussion i�is comriittee liad in regard to their <br />relationship tivith tha new ilaqnin� Committee to �e set up. His corrmiittee <br />felt there sho�.;.ld be a clear definition of responsioilities as pertained <br />to each co�vnittee. iiayor Ashbach e�;plained that the new committee would <br />do more on lono ranEe studies for future planning whereas P;Ir. Kennedy's <br />present committee vaill still handle the same day* to day problems they <br />have in tne past. Rezoning prohabl5� would no longer be a part of the work <br />of rv:r. Kenned�}s comr,littee. <br />Plans for an Arden ?iills cleanup carnpai�n vrere presented. Tr.ree or four <br />sgggested steps vrere as follo�vs: <br />1. Newspaper publicity {clerk to write notica). <br />2. Leaflets �o be passed froin door to door. <br />3. iromotion on tne part of the League of Tuomen Voters. <br />4. tiiolaticns to be reported and council to take action. <br />,iit�yor Ashbach questiotted tne part of the ordinance forbidding an individual <br />to haul his own rubbish to the dump. He defiriitely is opposed to t:�is <br />• portion. <br />� � <br />