Laserfiche WebLink
w <br />�-� <br />Minutes of Sp�cial Council <br />Vtllag� of Arden Hilis <br />Tuesday, August 21, 1979 - <br />Village Hall <br />Meetina <br />7:30 p.m. <br />Call to Order <br />Pursuar�t:to due call and nottce tfiereof, Mayor Crepeau called the <br />m�eting to order aY ?:30 p.m. <br />Roll Call <br />Present - Mayor Henry J. Crepesu, Jr., Councllmen James Wingert, <br />Charlie Crtchton, Ward Hanson, Robert Woodtrurn . <br />s <br />Absent - None <br />Also Presenfi - Vlllaqe Engi�eer ponatd Christoffersen, Fiscal Con- <br />sul#ant Peter Popo�ich, Treasurer ponald Lamb, Clerk <br />Administrator Charlofite McNiesh, Deputy Clerk. Dorothy <br />Zehm <br />PUBLIC NEARINGS: iSee atteched for more detatfed Minutes) <br />Mayor Cr�peau opened the Public Nearing at 7:35 p.m. and Clerk Admin- <br />Isfiretor McNiesh veriffed pubiication ot Hearinq Notice in the Mew <br />Brighton Bulletin on August 2, 1979, and that poti¢es were mefled <br />to affected property owners on August 6, 1979. <br />After a brief descrtption of the ar�a involved in th� watnr impro�+e- <br />ments by Enuineer Christofiersen, and an explanatfon ot Froposed, <br />financtnq ay PTscal Co�switant Popovtch, the fofTowing cou�ments <br />we re heard: <br />f. McNiesh read two letters prof�sttng the srea charge <br />on propertles not acivally served: <br />� <br />2. <br />3. <br />Mr. Jim Milier, 4482 N. Snellinq Avenue, asked that pro- <br />posed charc�es be repeated for residenttal and commerciai <br />front foot and �creage. <br />Answer by Popovich: <br />RQstdential front foot @ S 13,982665 <br />Commercial fronfi toot t 20�973997 <br />Residentiat Acreage Q 559..306b <br />Commerct:al Acreage � 838.9599 <br />Mr. JoMn Grudnoske, 4439 Hiqhway, 10 <br />Reviewed ifst of names of thpse pr�sent afi previous <br />Hearings on February 6th and June 19th. Asked,why <br />propert;es not actually served should Ce assessed; said <br />he and Ervins repatred tfietr welis (his cost at $1,400) <br />eft�r the water mein on Highway ID Nas doted down; sees <br />no advantag� to his property; has 1 house in center of <br />his 1.6 aere !ofi which cannot Le sub-di:VFded;'(road at <br />front and lake to r�ar?. <br />Answer by Christoffersen: <br />Poticy has heen to charge Ist 200" of property <br />depth from street a front foot a�sessment; 6al- <br />ance of property an acreage assessment. <br />Woodburn and Han�on concurred tAat if lot cannot <br />be subdivided, it does nat seem appropriate to <br />eharge both an acreage and front topt eharge. <br />4. Letartd RoebkeT 4355 Hiqhway 10 <br />Said hee doesn't agree thaY an area charge is reasonabfe; <br />get assessed, Dut no water; If you assess me, then give <br />me water; oth�rwise I M�ve no Intention of paying this <br />sssessa+�nt; said thts area charge should hays been made <br />ciear before this meeting. <br />