Laserfiche WebLink
Mrs. McNiesh reported that her recorda show that a notice <br />of the feasibility hearing on the proposed Connelly Avenue was <br />sent on January 20, 1978 to JaR,R „ Ince, 527 Shoreview Park <br />Street, the same address to which the assessment notice was sent, <br />and that the feasibility hearing notice was never returned, <br />Therefore, she assumed it was deliveredo <br />AIl2. JOHN RYSGAARD, owner of the property at 1253 <br />• Connelly° Objected to the fact that St. Paul �ook an <br />ery is not being assessed for part of the cost of the <br />drainage facilities, A3ra Rysgaard further said that <br />West <br />d Station- <br />storm <br />there had <br />been total street construction there previous to this program <br />which included provision for storm water anc� that the present <br />storm water prograr� is for the benefit of only one property <br />owner and should be paid for as a part of that owner°s inprove- <br />ment project. Iie said he was referring to the Flaherty <br />improvement, <br />So far as the assessments for street, curb and gutter are <br />concerned, IZr. Rysgaar�l said that only 58°� to 59; of the costs <br />are being allocated to Flaherty, but Yiis property abuts on 70� <br />of the street, MCDonald`s property has 13� frontage and 13� <br />assessment. Shx� Lumber is 3b frontage and 6b assessment. <br />His own property has 66 of the frontage and 12sa of the assess- <br />ment. Sheet metal is at Srs and 10�. IIe further said the cal- <br />culation used for his property was 220 feet, but he has only <br />187 feet, <br />Mr. Rysqaard said he believes the assessments should be <br />consistent with the proportionate value. He also said that <br />30" of the street project should have been part of the Flaherty <br />project and not spread over the assessment of abutting property <br />ov�ners . <br />Councilman Hanson then introduced the following resolution <br />and moved its adoption: <br />f2ESOLUTIOAt NO, �0 ��/ <br />RESOLUTTOI� ADOPTIidG AbID CONFIRP�7ING <br />ASSESSP9EidTS FOh ITiPROV�b'LEIdT NO, P-ST-77-6 <br />SE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden <br />• <br />Eills, Llinnesota as follorasa <br />1. The amount proper anc� necessary to be specially <br />assessed at this time for Improvement Noe P-ST-77-6 against <br />every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land affected thereby <br />has been duly calculated upon the basis of benefits, without <br />regard to cash valuation, in accordance with the provisions of <br />tdinnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, as ar.!ended, and notice has been <br />duly mailed and published., as required by law, that this Council <br />