Laserfiche WebLink
ti <br />�' �9i;�utes o� tZagular Counci I��ae� �rq August !4, l978 <br />Page Tao <br />Wingert rev3ewed the differences betwe•en this plan, and the one denied <br />a year ago, as being very minor; there was some speculation in the <br />Pianniog Commission changinq certain feafures of the buildinq; <br />understands there ara differences in funding, how tAe proJecfi might <br />run; essentiaily, as f�r �s:th�'�i$y es coa�cerned, it is the same <br />use, sams siza generally; no 4-lex�s are shown in thei� current <br />planning; proposs 172 apartrnent unifis:and 60'nursing care untts). <br />.��a.�.� � �rJ.� <br />Crich�on moved�that Coun �i de a Sp�ctal Use Permifi for a retire- <br />ment center us� of the TCCH propar-�y, as described in Case 78-20, <br />based on its incompatibiltYy with the surroundino residentiai area, <br />zone� R-1. <br />• Sn discussion, it was CounciB9S understandtng that if the motion <br />passes, ?her� will ba no discussioro of the plan details; if 4he <br />mo4lon fails, 6t gives the daveloper Yhe Indication of how he can <br />proceed; motton p�rtains to -the proposed "use", not destgn detail <br />and pians preseni-ed. <br />Grichton expl�in�d thafi the mo4fon u:as made becauss it appears �hat <br />p�articular tract o# iand is no4 what he wauld consider an 3soiated <br />area. s�parted by natural boundaries from existing residenfilaB; if <br />fihe entira tract o� land were inclWded (County Road E to �ailroad <br />an6 OId Highway i0 (Sneiiing) to Hamiina), he may teel very differently; <br />this fract is nea:'h to severa! residanfifai lots, so feels !fis use as <br />'snstitutiona! hod�sing or a nursing home does not fit fihis particular <br />Eocation. <br />Pete,rsec� n��tad tha$ the parcel is buffered by a park in the eastern <br />portlon, wooda on �the e��sf and fhe r�i i road on the nor�'h <br />4loodburn said hls opinions are dop�neent upon the Judge+uenf of those <br />uho are aff�e��ed; app�rars that ai� !$ast halt of the pee�te, ond psrhaps <br />more, who are directiy and closely invoived, within 350' of the <br />proj�ct, dld nofi say in their judgement, it would be a degradation <br />of fe�e nelgh�orh4ad, and thes� are the peaple most nearly atfecfed <br />by 4he proJ�c�r; the maJ�rity saem to say it is right nex� to me and <br />ii�'s �oot 6nappropriate. <br />H�nson exp�essed his ad�atra#iars ta iCCN On "coming back" Yo sub- <br />s4antiate �h�i- som� of the rssidenfs fa�or the project; noteci that <br />soms are s'F614, hoadever, oppcsod -�o fhe oroposel. <br />Hing<3rt no��ed thr�t Yi�e concerns of �h� affected residents a�e <br />imporS'ani'; d� �c� k�ear a clear sYat�men4 from ihe nearby property <br />owners; 5�E3f71 "io have a 50/50 s6tu�+ion; Council must give 4hought <br />to 4he afr'a3ci� of 4h� lar�d usg on this neighborhood; appears that <br />TCCii is wi3iing �:o d�si3n.to r�asaeaatiKe circumsFances if neighbor- <br />haod or Counc's3 c�n supNiy d6recfion fo negate the abjections; sees <br />a largs i�s3a-;-utfon and a smai[ group of residen#s that s�emingi.y <br />b�,long to Eio neighborhood - ar� ��!e��ively segregafied; teels tha4 <br />"CE4y of �om�s" eonecspf is nct �a�sl! carried ou'r by fihis institution. <br />hlaodl;urn n«ted thaY #he proposai es for apartmanfi residential; <br />-�herc3fore, a p$rnifified use (n R--I w?th a Speciaf Use P�Pmi�t. <br />� Cr��H�au wo•ied 9h�i� i-he inten+ o�f th�,mmoftor�, ifi it passes, is'that <br />aaa�`iiar s€�te r�ou6d hav�a �o b�i saiag�4�; df mot6on does raoY pass, then <br />Cuun�il wii0 r.onsS��r fha sp��i§ies as ouSii�de� by ths Planning <br />uommission. <br />C�mmEan7s fi-om �hm � loor opposerg i•i��, �re;ye�c$ were heard: <br />Hoaa�ro fC�rn - wan�rs ar�a tivase of 4�egh�vay 51 to ramein R-I <br />rc�siden•��i�III, �rii�h sirar�le-��mily h;om��; C@i'y needs a higher <br />pc�puta-hion �f c�iidren - hays elesed -two schools. <br />�€36!"qB Saiitr�crns � Pe�6�-ion prr�5or�red by TCCN includes re�ters <br />�nd �iaopl� nai in ciosa proxsm;�y fio 7CCH project; 4hose contacted <br />xejre� the�se krao�r� ±o b� is� `�vor; previous P�t?tior. o�: a ye�r aga <br />abr,fi �to a! i �eeighboe�s oi TCCN pr:��e�rties - i7 of 28 in opposftion.. <br />L�srry �'E,i-a:•san scid 1? of 20 on curr�nY Pe'Y6'rian f�vor the projec�t. <br />Da3e Hit:kS - 5`ee6s paopla on ;h�, sou-�h 5ida Of County Road E wiii <br />4o as a�rac-te� as those on #he no�-tti; a residenfilal area and i5 <br />�p�oseci io this i.isr �r 'rhe �rop�r9•b. <br />_. 2 m <br />